https://twitter.com/Biz_Shrink/status/1740790026802462918
Added: the apology is about her claim that Trump visited the Epstein pedo island once, in 1997.
But when I see this tweet she retweeted its possible she is a Zionist asset.
https://twitter.com/Biz_Shrink/status/1740790026802462918
Added: the apology is about her claim that Trump visited the Epstein pedo island once, in 1997.
But when I see this tweet she retweeted its possible she is a Zionist asset.
Yes it was.
There there, you are assuming again.
If you have no idea what she is apologising for, then you are not in a position to judge whether her apology should be taken at face value or not. Infact, your opinion in this regards is what we call "Uninformed opinion".
Evidence? If you know something, tell me from what source you know. You simply haven't been doing that. And you certainly have no power to look inside her mind.
How do you prove that her apology was not bona fide? You've already danced down a stairway of deduction fueled by your suppositions about what she knew or didn't know, with no room for her error or inattention.
I would not recommend you to be empaneled as a juror.
Are you asking this question in good faith?
Don't be an idiot. How would I know unless you answer the question? Don't bother, then, since you think you have to ask that question. (What would a "yes" answer mean to you? You would have no idea if it was the truth or a lie.) You have a problem dealing with reality; you expect it to be a disguise for ulterior motives.