I find that the cabal very much "plays by the rules" when they make a statement like this, and our response must be to read their narrative in a very lawyerly manner and look for the actual method of harm.

Essentially, they never directly lie. It's always misdirection.

So regarding shedding:

https://www.epainassist.com/coronavirus/what-is-vaccine-shedding-and-do-covid-19-vaccines-shed

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/facts.html

Note that the cabal defines shedding very narrowly and only in the context of traditional vaccines which are attenuated viruses.

And indeed, If you read those links you'll see they acknowledge that traditional vaccines do indeed shed viral components--because that's what traditional vaccines are!

So what does this mean in the context of viral-vector and mRNA vaccines? It means the harm must come from something other than shedding, or through a behavior that is like shedding but not in the traditional, scientific sense of the word.

It's critical for us to realize that a person vaccinated with mRNA or viral vector will not shed any virus because they have not been vaccinated with an attenuated virus, and nothing in the mRNA or viral vector causes the body to produce a full version of the virus.

If they shed anything it will be the spike protein and it's important that we be aware of how this fits into the scientific definitions and how the "debunk" narratives are being applied. If we know more than the debunkers we come off very well.