It's almost as if the wide levels of genetic variation across the species lead to wildly different outcomes for individuals.
Science that tells you something is fully good or fully bad for people is not science. It's the product of an intern who was not supervised properly, or someone who was paid to lie to you.
The obvious thing you can, and should ask, is "are there food pairings which reduce the negative impacts of caffeine while leaving the positive ones?" If they didn't even suggest that question, then they're latter type, and they're just flat out lying to you.
It's almost as if the wide levels of genetic variation across the species lead to wildly different outcomes for individuals.
Science that tells you something is fully good or fully bad for people is not science. It's the product of an intern who was not supervised properly, or someone who was paid to lie to you.
The obvious thing you can, and should ask, is "are there food pairings which reduce the negative impacts of caffeine while leaving the positive ones?" If they didn't even suggest that question, then they're latter type, and they're just flat out lying to you.
This.