Keep going.
What are the different levels of absorption for the different compounds you've mentioned?
How much glycinate would you have to take, in terms of bioavailability, to match the power of the other two?
Again, your body is not a car, there is no "formula" for living successfully. There are merely patterns. Not all of them apply to all people. Outcomes can be challenged by genetic factors. Simple advice can be dangerous.
Please don't take so much of a drug that it loosens your stool. And "sub stool loosening" doses probably aren't a statistically or practically useful measure. You might consider if you have other problems, like water intake, or other challenges, that would be better solved first.
I was extremely ill with a rare kidney disease
Most people aren't. I'm glad you found a way to manage your health. I think your perspectives are skewed by the extremities of the challenges you faced.
I'm not saying you're wrong for your life, but other people should see this before they decide to blindly follow your advice.
Electrolytes (it's just salt, dude) cause water to move. This is why they're an excellent laxative. Seriously, google "magnesium laxative."
If you take a large dose of laxatives and don't drink enough water you're pushing your body to a bad corner. Your advice is bad and is based off a misunderstanding. You should get an understanding before you hand out advice.
Yes it is critical which is why your kidneys recycle magnesium. 95% of it is retained through this mechanism.
If you suspect you have low magnesium then the blood work will show that. It's a diagnostic. Your stools are NOT. Your advice has about as much value as those stools.
Magnesium is a known laxative. You have loose stools because you're literally taking a laxative dose of it.
Your body is not a simple machine. Get blood work or simple home testing kits. The density of your morning shit is not a diagnostic reference.
They're going to create a new class of "uberprocessed" foods and then pretend it's good for any person or the planet as a whole.
I genuinely hate these people. They're nihilists. They don't care. They just latch on to every "good sounding" idea and then press it to it's maximum profit conclusion.
They share the same energy as Satan and his demons.
I look around the world, particularly South America, and I just don't see the circumstances that would justify asylum. There aren't massive political upheavals, the military is not in charge anywhere, and mass graves just aren't being created.
I get that living in El Salvador probably sucks, but you need to stay there, and make it better. You're not "persecuted" you're just "unlucky."
This is the idiot who couldn't be respectful during the State of the Union?
You ever notice they act out when their donors die or stop giving them money?
Good luck in the next race, Al. Maybe the tricks will save you?
Like uhhh you know insurance is passing your responsibility onto someone else, right?
It would be if you didn't have to pay for it. You're sharing responsibility with others. Which is fine is a private model but is insane in a public model.
I'm not being responsible if I don't have insurance
You're opening the door to ruining your life. If you're unconscious somewhere you can't make medical decisions. A default set of decisions are made for you. You're going to be billed for them anyways.
Your insurance agent knows way more about hospital billing than you ever could. Which is fine in a regulated model but is insane when hospitals and insurance work together.
The ideas are perfectly fine. The implementations are not.
At the start of WW2 it was common practice for submarines to tell cargo ships they were about to be attacked and they should abandon ship before being fired upon.
People really should sit down and study the history of war. In particular how they start. All it takes is one young bosnian and you could suddenly be in serious trouble.
2024: Debt spending that will cripple your children.
2025: Debt spending that will cripple your children.
Aren't they the same picture?