Jeffrey Epstein's brother said on Wednesday that his sibling claimed to have information about Donald Trump and Bill Clinton which was so explosive it would derail the 2016 presidential election.
also
Bill Clinton is expected to be identified as 'John Doe 36' in a trove of court documents related to Epstein set to be released on Wednesday. Donald Trump is also likely to be named.
The article goes on to say DJT and Jeff were buddies in the 90's etc, but says NOTHING about Trump banning Epstein from Mar-a Lago after the truth once he learned the truth about Epstein in the early 2000s. Or about Trump being the only person of interest to actually assist the lawyer handling the case for Epstein victims (https://rumble.com/vdc3hf-bradley-edwards-defends-donald-trump-in-jeffery-epstein-case.html)
Sigh. Corporate Media are truly the scum of the earth....
Email of the author. in case you wish to fill her in on few facts that are actually relevant to her article. Who knows? Maybe she's just incompetent.
So someone claimed to have info that was "so explosive" it would derail 2016 (implying that it would derail Trump)...
And they didn't release it? If they were actually humanitarians and cared about the victims, why didn't they dump it all out and take down that monster DJT. It would have solved all their problems!
If they had anything useful, they would have used it. This is such a cheap bluff.
The "someone" who claimed that he had info on Trump was Jeffrey Epstein. At least, according to what his brother Mark says he told him.
Does anyone on the planet think Jeffrey Epstein was a humanitarian? He was the one MAKING the victims. It doesn't make much sense to talk about Epstein releasing information on Trump because he's a humanitarian or cared about victims (He was making) etc.
The "they" you are talking about here is Epstein himself.
It's not really a bluff. It's an allegation. But yeah, its slimy as heck.
Sigh. Trying everything they can do to tie DJT to Epstein.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12924305/jeffrey-epstein-bill-clinton-donald-trump-2016-election.html
also
The article goes on to say DJT and Jeff were buddies in the 90's etc, but says NOTHING about Trump banning Epstein from Mar-a Lago after the truth once he learned the truth about Epstein in the early 2000s. Or about Trump being the only person of interest to actually assist the lawyer handling the case for Epstein victims (https://rumble.com/vdc3hf-bradley-edwards-defends-donald-trump-in-jeffery-epstein-case.html)
Sigh. Corporate Media are truly the scum of the earth....
Email of the author. in case you wish to fill her in on few facts that are actually relevant to her article. Who knows? Maybe she's just incompetent.
[email protected]
So someone claimed to have info that was "so explosive" it would derail 2016 (implying that it would derail Trump)...
And they didn't release it? If they were actually humanitarians and cared about the victims, why didn't they dump it all out and take down that monster DJT. It would have solved all their problems!
If they had anything useful, they would have used it. This is such a cheap bluff.
Um, I think you may have misread.
The "someone" who claimed that he had info on Trump was Jeffrey Epstein. At least, according to what his brother Mark says he told him.
Does anyone on the planet think Jeffrey Epstein was a humanitarian? He was the one MAKING the victims. It doesn't make much sense to talk about Epstein releasing information on Trump because he's a humanitarian or cared about victims (He was making) etc.
The "they" you are talking about here is Epstein himself.
It's not really a bluff. It's an allegation. But yeah, its slimy as heck.