Vivek brutally attacking wokeism: WAPO reporter doubles down: « You didn’t say that you condemn white supremacy though. » She immediately regrets it. - The Great Awakening

194

Vivek brutally attacking wokeism: WAPO reporter doubles down: « You didn’t say that you condemn white supremacy though. » She immediately regrets it. (files.catbox.moe) - N C S W I C -

posted 353 days ago by penisse 353 days ago by penisse +194 / -0

47 comments

47 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (47)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– Prodigalonmyknees 2 points 352 days ago +2 / -0

Fantastic point. I don’t trust any establishment politician. I don’t trust any woke person. And I certainly don’t trust anyone that has been a part of WEF. But damn! Vivek says the things that need to be said like no one else. Even Trump has never made a statement that poignant about wokeism and media treason. Hope Vivek really is on our side.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– TSearch 1 point 352 days ago +1 / -0

Somedays I don’t know what to believe. I know there have been several people who claimed the WEF used their names without getting permission. But, did they only contest it when it became politically inconvenient?

Anyway I did a quick search and found this, I think the Tennessee Star is a paper owned by John Fredericks, he appears a lot on Bannon’s Show.

https://tennesseestar.com/news/world-economic-forum-settles-with-vivek-ramaswamy-officially-removes-the-gop-presidential-candidate-from-young-global-leaders-list/khousler/2023/08/02/

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q