What is your best guess from best hopes to best guess from logic and fact?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (123)
sorted by:
I don't think making the names involved in the Epstein case public will change anything, legally speaking.
After all, the prosecutors already had all this information all these years. It's just that the names were withheld from the public.
Honestly, I don't think many people other than Anons are going to care at all. They haven't cared for the past four and a half years.
I think the only people it will really impact is us, and that's because it's probably going to backfire on us. Way too many people think that just because someone's name was released it means they were involved in all the sexual abuse and other crimes on Epstein's island. And now they're telling normies these things, trying to red pill them. Or they're using it to gloat and trying to rub it in liberals' faces.
Here are the issues with that:
Just because someone's name was released doesn't mean they were involved with anything going down on the island.
President Trump's name was released because he was mentioned in someone else's deposition stating that they never saw him on the island.
Slick Willy was mentioned in someone else's deposition saying that they had heard from someone else that he liked his girls young. I can't find anything where he is mentioned going to the island. And as to Clinton liking his girls young, no shit. He was having an affair with Monica Lewinski when she was 22 and he was 50. "Young" is not synonymous with "underage" or "child".
Then you have the names of the investigators and other DOJ involved in handling the case. Then there are the names of the victims and witnesses and all the other people who were just mentioned like with President Trump.
People really need to stop assuming that just because someone's name was released that it implicates, let alone proves that they are guilty of anything.
Because when normies hear this, they're going to either look it up themselves or go to the fact-checking places. Then they're going to see that the person they were told was guilty of all these horrible crimes was an investigator or witness in the case, or was just mentioned by others like President Trump.
And that's going to make the person claiming they were guilty of something look like an idiot. And by extension, it's going to negatively impact the public's opinion of Q and Anons.
So yeah, I think this is going to turn around and bite us on the ass.
well said fren,the only thing that will matter are the ten toes up and the ten toes down tapes of the really young ones,16 and 17 are mostly legal consent and 14 in most states unless claims of rape at any age,and then they will claim they were doctored.
Yes, Very well said and Great Points.
Speaking only for myself, I don't need any help in the "Looking Stupid" dept. In fact I was called out last night for a post I made (and rightfully so) that I could not verify 100%, I was going mostly on assumption and past record.
Accusations require proof, maybe not 100%, but certainly more than just assuming due to past bad deeds 😞
Dude, there are flight logs with Bill and Hillary going both together and separately to the Island 26 times.
26 times bro, we had this proof back in 2017.
I agree, everyone listed in depositions does not mean they diddled the donkeys but match the names up with flight logs and testimony of victims and you have some pretty big names. Then look at known pedophiles like Kevin Spacey being on the list and you can deduce a huge percentage were there doing exactly what we suspect.
You can only come home to your wife smelling like perfume with lipstick on your collar so many times before your excuses are no longer believed.
I have just gotten into looking at the Epstein stuff, and I wasn't aware of those flight logs.
When I wrote that post, I was in the middle of reading each of those documents released. I simply hadn't seen anything in those documents about them going to the island.
I didn't claim that they had never been there. I said I hadn't seen anything about him being at the island so far. Because I hadn't. I had only seen the comments about the "he likes them young" quote.
Thanks for the info in your post. It will help me learn more about this.