Raskin: ‘No Question’ Trump Violated the Foreign Emoluments Clause - The Great Awakening

Raskin: ‘No Question’ Trump Violated the Foreign Emoluments Clause (www.breitbart.com) 🤡 Clown World 🌎

posted 363 days ago by bigsix 363 days ago by bigsix +66 / -1

Raskin: 'No Question' Trump Violated the Foreign Emoluments Clause

Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD) said Thursday on MSNBC's "All In" that there was "no question" former President Donald Trump violated the Constitution's foreign emoluments clause, which prohibits the president from accepting payments or gifts from forei...

22 comments

22 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (22)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– CQVFEFE 3 points 363 days ago +3 / -0

The projection.

The Emoluments Clause was stated in an absolute categorical terms that the president, and no federal official can take any money of any kind whatsoever an emolument or an office or a present or a title from the prince, king, or foreign government without the explicit consent of Congress. Every other president in our history has scrupulously obeyed that command.”

Just not the current one, who has received tens of millions of dollars from China.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– merf 1 point 363 days ago +1 / -0

The pattern is so well set now that the plot is almost painful.

Trump gets indicted for a crime he's clearly innocent of, the precedent for the charge of a high official is set, and the runway is then clear for the same to happen to Biden and others.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q