Good point.

Imagine living in a country where the people are so stupid (not all people) that they need the highest court to tell them a person cannot perform an insurrection on themselves.

Seriously sad, is it not?

If you are the king of the hill, why would you take yourself out (insurrect yourself)? A king of the hill could possibly claim being a dictator and refuse to be removed by using illegal means or possibly legal means.

This is still what I think they thought Trump would do. When he did not, they came up with this insurrection thing.

Then to add, a state claims we cannot vote for a man who tried to insurrect themselves?

I am not perfect at punctuation, but I am nobody. Would the SC be asking amongst themselves… WTF is this?

Oh yeah … we do live in such a country.