It's not about the name. Part of the takeover was the demonization of all opposing forks and the narrative that big blocks is destructive to decentralization which couldn't be further from the truth and yet to this day it is a verboten topic among bitcoiners.
If people go read the Bitcoin whitepaper today they are reading about Bitcoin Cash, not the software called BTC which has been radically altered.
No it's not. It's fundamental to the discussion because anyone adopting "Bitcoin" these days is falling victim to a fraud they don't understand thinking they are protecting their life savings but doing just the opposite because they don't know the real history of the tech.
Right... But for all intents and purposes, when people talk about Bitcoin, they're not referring to BCH.
It's not about the name. Part of the takeover was the demonization of all opposing forks and the narrative that big blocks is destructive to decentralization which couldn't be further from the truth and yet to this day it is a verboten topic among bitcoiners.
If people go read the Bitcoin whitepaper today they are reading about Bitcoin Cash, not the software called BTC which has been radically altered.
Bud, you and I both know this, but it's moot to the conversation, and is just pedantic for no reason.
No it's not. It's fundamental to the discussion because anyone adopting "Bitcoin" these days is falling victim to a fraud they don't understand thinking they are protecting their life savings but doing just the opposite because they don't know the real history of the tech.
Having worked on both ARK and ALGO I’d loooooove to hear your ‘HODL’ thoughts on BCH maximalism 🙄