I started out asking about the CDC whistleblower, Dr William Thompson,
and then moved onto Thompson's co-author Frank DeStefano.
I asked ChatGPT to provide me with examples of DeStefano demonstrating competence and/or proficiency in using studies to find vaccine problems.
ChatGPT's answer was basically that the consensus among scientists is that vaccines are safe.
When i pressed on, ChatGPT basically took the position that because vaccines are so safe, its highly improbable, if not impossible, to ever find any safety issues with any vaccines.
Now bear in mind, this ChatGPT bot is just spitting out whatever a consensus of scientists have already said,
And so that consensus of scientists is that every vaccine is 100% safe, which is why its very reasonable to never find any vaccine problem.
GIGO: Garbage In, Garbage Out
You see where this line of reasoning is heading?
These "studies" are a mere formality. a pesky technicality.
They rationalize NOT doing safety studies, because it deprives some poor kid in the control group of his vaccine, which is essential to his survival.
https://i.redd.it/lzu8gjm61dbz.jpg
They already know what the conclusion of their study will be, before the study even begins.
They are merely going thru the motions.
So then i pressed on, and asked ChatGPT for a NAME of anyone who had successfully used a study to find any vaccine problem.
ChatGPT replied with Andrew Wakefield!
I asked ChatGPT what Andrew Wakefield had found...
ChatGPT went on about how Andrew Wakefield fabricated this vaccine-autism link, which has been thoroughly debunked by every scientist in the world, and how Wakefield was stricken off the record...
So then I said to ChatGPT...
Can you name anyone OTHER THAN Andrew Wakefield who has successfully used a study to find a vaccine problem?
and ChatGPT could not name one single person.
These vaccine studies aren't designed TO find vaccine problems,
These vaccine studies are designed to NOT find vaccine problems.
PS. i should mention that ChatGPT version is only up to date until 2022, and supposedly in the meantime Frank DeStefano has finally been able to demonstrate that studies can find problems, by finding a problem with COVID 19 vaccine, long after everyone else knew it was a problem (like blood clots, etc)
Thanks for the background on Deer. I was wondering why the result popped up so readily...
It's maddening that we're blocked from accessing nation-level data on vaccine harm but this Deer character is encouraged to harass individual study participants w/no repercussions...