I've read about 4 studies on Jewish genetics before and the score was 2-2. Whenever a study came out that they weren't descendants of Israelites another study came out and refuted it with their own research.
Now the score is 3-2 to the khazar hypothesis. Watch how quickly a new contesting study comes out.
How do they know the genetics of the ancient Israelites?
Do they dig up and test the ancients remains? Or are they just guessing what they might be.
What standard are they measuring by? How do they get DNA from bones? Are they sure that those bones are a pure blooded Israelite and not an Edomite or philistine?
Or are they testing older markers in the khazar genetics and confirming themselves? In a A Priori manner.
What genetic marker are they looking for? What incontrovertible proof is there that this an Israelite?
That's where we did come from before we entered Europe though (600-500BC). The Arabs only took over during the Islamic period (600-700AD). So we cant look at populations now and assume they were always like that. Over 400 years ago whites weren't in America.
Europeans didn't grow on the rocks of the Caucusus mountains we simply passed through them into Europe. The ones that passed through the caucusus the Greeks called Keltoi but there was another group that entered Europe through present day Turkey the Greeks called Cimmeroi.
Even if you don't believe the Biblical belief that we all come from the early mesopatamian culture of Iraq, the secularists accept we came from the early neolithic farmers from the mideast.
Whether we come from the mideast is not the debate, it's when did we come from there into Europe. Secularists say 8000 years ago but historical written records and archaeology (and lack of archaeology in Europe, excluding the mediterranean coastline) say it was 600-500BC.
I don't understand what you are getting at, young_patriot said whites cant be from the mid east so addressed that, now youre arguing when fair skin and eyes developed.
I can't speak to when whiite skin and blue eyes began but I know the Nords also come from the same people that entered into Europe from the Caucusus mountains around 600 BC.
I used the word 'we' as a general term as we Europeans. I'm white skin and blue eyes and I'm not Nordic and my ancestors most likely came to the British Isles from the Mediterranean culture, different from the Keltoi people.
I've read about 4 studies on Jewish genetics before and the score was 2-2. Whenever a study came out that they weren't descendants of Israelites another study came out and refuted it with their own research.
Now the score is 3-2 to the khazar hypothesis. Watch how quickly a new contesting study comes out.
How do they know the genetics of the ancient Israelites? Do they dig up and test the ancients remains? Or are they just guessing what they might be.
What standard are they measuring by? How do they get DNA from bones? Are they sure that those bones are a pure blooded Israelite and not an Edomite or philistine?
Or are they testing older markers in the khazar genetics and confirming themselves? In a A Priori manner.
What genetic marker are they looking for? What incontrovertible proof is there that this an Israelite?
You barely need a DNA test to know that people with white skin and blue eyes might not be entirely indigenous to the middle east.
That's where we did come from before we entered Europe though (600-500BC). The Arabs only took over during the Islamic period (600-700AD). So we cant look at populations now and assume they were always like that. Over 400 years ago whites weren't in America.
Europeans didn't grow on the rocks of the Caucusus mountains we simply passed through them into Europe. The ones that passed through the caucusus the Greeks called Keltoi but there was another group that entered Europe through present day Turkey the Greeks called Cimmeroi.
Even if you don't believe the Biblical belief that we all come from the early mesopatamian culture of Iraq, the secularists accept we came from the early neolithic farmers from the mideast.
Whether we come from the mideast is not the debate, it's when did we come from there into Europe. Secularists say 8000 years ago but historical written records and archaeology (and lack of archaeology in Europe, excluding the mediterranean coastline) say it was 600-500BC.
Your "we" seems to be a slim margin of the population. Nordic Europeans developed light skin and blue eyes many thousands of years ago.
I don't understand what you are getting at, young_patriot said whites cant be from the mid east so addressed that, now youre arguing when fair skin and eyes developed.
I can't speak to when whiite skin and blue eyes began but I know the Nords also come from the same people that entered into Europe from the Caucusus mountains around 600 BC.
I used the word 'we' as a general term as we Europeans. I'm white skin and blue eyes and I'm not Nordic and my ancestors most likely came to the British Isles from the Mediterranean culture, different from the Keltoi people.