No, The Constitution Does Not Allow Children Born Of Non-Citizens To Become President Of The United States
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (104)
sorted by:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/natural_born_citizen#:~:text=Under%20the%2014th%20Amendment%27s%20Naturalization,referred%20to%20as%20birthright%20citizenship.
Here we go. Someone posted this a few days ago and I thought it was very good. https://youtu.be/h9PxdDvgQks?si=atvhwZSnU8RWxzh2
Also the Post & Mail always has the answer. https://www.thepostemail.com/2023/01/30/nikki-haley-is-not-a-natural-born-citizen-of-usa-to-constitutional-standards-not-eligible-to-be-president/
https://www.thepostemail.com/2019/06/25/is-kamala-harris-a-natural-born-citizen/
That’s for minimum citizenship requirement, not presidential requirements which are more. Natural Born is not same as native born.
IMO they got that ruling wrong because foreigners are subject to foreign powers not to US.
Not attacking you, but consider the source.
I followed and spent a lot of time at Legal Insurrection. The guy that runs it, William Jacobson, is a Professor at Cornell. It took me a few years to realize that he's just Controlled Opposition as he beat many of my fellow Birthers on his site over the head with misdirection, refusal to debate and practically pounded his chest that he was the authority on the matter.
("§212. Citizens and natives. - The natives, or Natural-Born Citizens, are those born in the country, of PARENTS who are citizens.")
The Kim Wong Ark case was decided based on the 14th Amendment.
It was not about Article 2 presidential qualifications.