alternative title:
Poll: Majority Americans Regret Taking Covid Vaccine
In an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine Doctor Joseph Lapado and Yale School of Public Health Doctor Harvey Risch are sounding the alarm that there may be serious underestimated risks involved with the side effects of the Wuhan Coronavirus vaccine.
This comes as an independent pollster found that a significant number of Americans regret receiving the vaccine in the first place.
10 percent of those vaccinated said they wish they hadn’t done so, while 15 percent of adults said they have been diagnosed with a new condition by a medical practitioner weeks or months after the first dose.
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) authorized the poll two years after the first vaccine was rolled out.
“The fact that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports more than 232 million Americans ages 18–65 have taken at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, and 15 percent of those surveyed report a newly diagnosed condition is concerning and needs further study,” Laura Bono, CHD’s executive director said.
The top conditions people reported were blood clots, disrupted menstrual cycles, heart attacks, strokes, lung clots and liver damage. 10 percent of these conditions among people who took the vaccine were severe.
Bono believes the government should have warned Americans that the mRNA vaccine technology is new, thus naturally have no long-term data that shows how the jab will effect people’s health years down the road.
The Epoch Times reported that in May, hospitals saw an increase in cases of heart inflammation among patients. They also noted that the media has given more attention to cases of blood clots despite myocarditis being more common.
Dr. Anthony Fauci also admitted that vaccine caused menstrual irregularities, saying that the issue is “temporary” and that they “need to study it more.”
That must be maddening! (Thank you for the explanation, btw.) I can't imagine how frustrating that must be for all of you.
When you say you go to the embassy for the interview, you must mean the embassy in the country where you currently reside. And it's someone there who makes the decision that will affect your entire life?
Have you tried reaching out to Thomas Renz -- Constitutional lawyer? I'm sure he's incredibly busy, but I know if nothing else, he can put you in touch with another constitutional lawyer. Because none of this makes sense on Constitutional lines.
The waiver decision is done by mail to USCIS. So that's someone sitting behind a desk.
The interview at the embassy is more a formality where you need to show up, present copies of all of the documents, and show you're a real person.
If you've managed to make it to the interview it's because you've cleared all of the paperwork and you're fairly likely to get approved.
What the interviewer is looking for is asking questions about human trafficking, making sure the story lines up and you are who you say you are.
An example was that I was behind a newly wed couple and the interviewer was asking them about where they met (in Vegas) and then proceeding to ask very nuanced questions about what they saw on the strip, where they had lunch and stuff like that to look for inconsistencies.
My wife and I have been married for several years and have kids, so generally we get an easy pass on those kinds of questions. If we get to the point of having another interview it'll pretty much mean we're able to move forward with the green card process.
I found him on twitter and sent him a note on the "contact us" through their law firm web site a few days ago. But I have not gotten a response.
Thanks. I sure hope you get a response from him! I know he must be extremely busy, being internet-known, but at least he might be able to point you in the right direction. Going through what you have would drive me to distraction. I think I'd go nuts.