alternative title:
Poll: Majority Americans Regret Taking Covid Vaccine
In an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine Doctor Joseph Lapado and Yale School of Public Health Doctor Harvey Risch are sounding the alarm that there may be serious underestimated risks involved with the side effects of the Wuhan Coronavirus vaccine.
This comes as an independent pollster found that a significant number of Americans regret receiving the vaccine in the first place.
10 percent of those vaccinated said they wish they hadn’t done so, while 15 percent of adults said they have been diagnosed with a new condition by a medical practitioner weeks or months after the first dose.
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) authorized the poll two years after the first vaccine was rolled out.
“The fact that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports more than 232 million Americans ages 18–65 have taken at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, and 15 percent of those surveyed report a newly diagnosed condition is concerning and needs further study,” Laura Bono, CHD’s executive director said.
The top conditions people reported were blood clots, disrupted menstrual cycles, heart attacks, strokes, lung clots and liver damage. 10 percent of these conditions among people who took the vaccine were severe.
Bono believes the government should have warned Americans that the mRNA vaccine technology is new, thus naturally have no long-term data that shows how the jab will effect people’s health years down the road.
The Epoch Times reported that in May, hospitals saw an increase in cases of heart inflammation among patients. They also noted that the media has given more attention to cases of blood clots despite myocarditis being more common.
Dr. Anthony Fauci also admitted that vaccine caused menstrual irregularities, saying that the issue is “temporary” and that they “need to study it more.”
This is why being travel banned from my own country is frustrating I'll take it because the jab is not an option. https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/panel-physicians/vaccinations.html#covid-19-vaccination
Could you please explain what your situation is? An American who has lived abroad for several years? An American on vacation? What is the reason they are keeping you out - other than you haven't had the shot? Surely there are other people who have traveled back and forth and not been vaxxed.
Sure! I'm an American whose been living abroad since 2007. My wife and I had our first kid in 2017 and we realized that we wanted to move back with family and have a support network. We started the green card application process around the time 2021 shortly having our second kid.
The "pandemic" was just starting to pick up into the lockdowns and I thought that the process takes about two years, so things should calm down by the time we finish the process and immigrate.
Originally our interview appointment was April 2023, and during that time the language was that if you didn't have the covid vaxx, you were inadmissible and your application would be thrown out on the spot if you didn't provide documentation of getting the jab.
We called the embassy and moved our interview back to July with the news that the Biden admin was getting rid of the executive order. Then it was either on May 11th or 12th where Biden signed an executive order that ended the emergency pandemic status and also ended the mandates for travel.
We checked the page for green card applicants and it still said the jab is required. The only difference is they took out the language of inadmissible. So on our interview in July where we would have otherwise been given our immigration visa, we were provided with a letter that says we are being refused our immigration visa, but we can appeal on religious or moral reasons.
The problem with the appeal on religious or moral reasons is the the way the law is framed. You need to have a religious or moral reason against ALL vaccines. So you're not allowed to say, "i refuse the clot shot because it will murder or maim me". And there is no hard criteria, it's completely up to the officer making the decision. So if you get refused you've now been refused a visa and it's a permanent mark that will make any future applications that much harder if you're allowed all.
I've been trying to follow up with lawyers to see what recourse there is in the possibility of an application being refused. I don't want to try and apply on my own and then try and scramble to have some lawyer pick up the pieces, I'd rather go in with a plan and wording that we'd be able to follow up with but no luck on that.
It's literally only the shot. If the CDC updates this page to get rid of the wording that says "covid-19 requirement" i can call the embassy and schedule an interview to get my wife's immigration visa. I have until July 2024 to either file a
https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/panel-physicians/vaccinations.html#covid-19-vaccination
This is true. It's not a restriction on travel, it's a requirement for green card (immigration) applicants. So tourists, students, or employment are in a different category and my understanding is the jab is not required even if the period of a visa is 2+ years, it's not considered immigration.
Title 42 ended for illegal immigration. Illegal immigrants are also not required to get the jab to my knowledge.
It's only a requirement for legal immigrants (green card) applicants. For example if you're getting married you can apply for a K1 visa that allows your spouse to come into the country so you can get married in the USA. You will not the need the jab for the k1 visa to get in the country, but you will need to the jab in order to get your green card to stay in the country.
In my case we applied for a k2 visa since we've been married for years. What happens is my wife gets a green card after landing in the country, which means she needs to have all of the requirements ahead of time which is why our immigration visa is being withheld because we don't have the jab.
That must be maddening! (Thank you for the explanation, btw.) I can't imagine how frustrating that must be for all of you.
When you say you go to the embassy for the interview, you must mean the embassy in the country where you currently reside. And it's someone there who makes the decision that will affect your entire life?
Have you tried reaching out to Thomas Renz -- Constitutional lawyer? I'm sure he's incredibly busy, but I know if nothing else, he can put you in touch with another constitutional lawyer. Because none of this makes sense on Constitutional lines.
The waiver decision is done by mail to USCIS. So that's someone sitting behind a desk.
The interview at the embassy is more a formality where you need to show up, present copies of all of the documents, and show you're a real person.
If you've managed to make it to the interview it's because you've cleared all of the paperwork and you're fairly likely to get approved.
What the interviewer is looking for is asking questions about human trafficking, making sure the story lines up and you are who you say you are.
An example was that I was behind a newly wed couple and the interviewer was asking them about where they met (in Vegas) and then proceeding to ask very nuanced questions about what they saw on the strip, where they had lunch and stuff like that to look for inconsistencies.
My wife and I have been married for several years and have kids, so generally we get an easy pass on those kinds of questions. If we get to the point of having another interview it'll pretty much mean we're able to move forward with the green card process.
I found him on twitter and sent him a note on the "contact us" through their law firm web site a few days ago. But I have not gotten a response.