Nikki Haley (Nimarata Nikki Haley (née Randhawa)) was born Jan. 20, 1972
Her father became a naturalized citizen on Oct. 18, 1977—five years after Nikki was born.
Therefore, Nikki’s father Ajit Singh Randhawa was NOT a natural born U.S. Citizen. He was born in Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Ajit Signh Randhawa. (Oct. 18, 1977). Petition for Naturalization, Cat. No. 2216867, Nikki Haley father. D.S.C., Columbia Division. Source:
https://www.ancestry.com/discoveryui-content/view/2805:2504
Click to access 1977-10-18-Ajit-Signh-Randhawa-Petition-for-Naturalization-Cat-No-2216867-Nikki-Haley-father-DSC-Columbia-Division-Oct-18-1977.pdf
That Harvard article is complete bullshit.
You have to read the article VERY carefully, because they mix concepts in a subtle and deceiving way.
They mixed the concept of "natural born citizen" with the concept of "citizen" and tried to claim that they are the same thing.
They are not.
The authors claim that anyone who is born to ONE citizen parent is a citizen. That is NOT what NATURAL BORN CITIZEN means.
The authors claim that anyone who is a "citizen" at birth is necessarily a "natural born citizen."
That is nonsense.
The authors even toss in the British concept of "natural born SUBJECT," which also is NOT the same, but want the reader to think it is.
When referencing the Nationality Act of 1790, the authors fail to mention that the 1790 act said that only WHITE people could become citizens.
That was not changed until 1965 when the commies infiltrated to subvert America.
So, who are the authors of this misleading "Harvard Law" opinion?
(1) Paul Clement - Honored by the Jewish Leadership Conference
https://www.jewishleadershipconference.org/speakers/
(2) Neal Katyal - Indian who also appears jewish, and is married to a jewish wife
https://www.tvguidetime.com/people/neal-katyal-faith-what-religion-does-he-follow-details-about-the-lawyer-369851.html
Does that have something to do with the writing of a deceptive and fraudulent article?
I don’t disagree. Thank you for providing more details to research. This is an interesting subject because it is the center of how our country has been subverted.
Yes, these people are experts at subversion (that seems to be their only real skill).
You almost have to understand the issues BEFORE you read their opinion of the issues, because they twist things out-of-context and the unsuspecting reader will have a hard time figuring that out.