A coincidence
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
Most of her fans are the people George Carlin was referring to with his “half the people are under that” joke.
They recalibrate the IQ curve every so often to force this outcome. A 100 IQ today is about a 120 IQ 60 years ago. So, it's a relative, and not a fixed scale.
It's a tool used to make people feel "dumb." So you can control them easier.
I’d bet money that our intelligence has gone way, way down, not up; that a 1960s 90 IQ is more like a 105 today; and that this has been done not only through poor education leaving minds unfully developed, but also by intentionally making people unhealthy and reducing nutrition.
The control has been done by hiding the truth of our civics and law system, corrupting the money, increasing dependency systems, and heavy heavy heavy brainwashing and deletion and rewriting of history.
You'd lose.
What are you basing this on?
You're mistaking "average" for "common."
I’m not against not losing money or changing my mind. What makes you say that?
What I said:
Not necessarily correct, but why I would surmise my statement.
Possibly, but I was also stating that control is done by shaping perception and controlling what’s widely known about “the machine”, so to speak. We both seem to be saying that perception shaping matters a lot on that front.
I think it’s the other way. Anyone scoring advanced (120) today would have probably scored about average (100) sixty years ago. There is a pretty clear dumbing down of the population. They want people to feel smart without actually giving them the tools they need.
They why would they adjust the IQ to always have a median of 100. That would do the opposite of what you're suggesting.
Because if you gave people an IQ test from 1950 and most people scored 80 or lower, people would start asking a lot of questions.