Q on Emotional Pushes
Q1988
See how FAKE NEWS works?
See how CLICKBAIT works?
See how EMOTIONAL PUSHES TO TARGETED READERS works?
Q
If you search the Q drops for the word "emotional' you will find several instances where Q elaborates on how emotional responses are used to manipulate people in a number of different ways.
This points to fact that it is important for truth warriors, anons, Q patriots and researchers, to a) be aware of how their own emotions may be being used or targeted and also b) to observe clearly when others are using emotional pushes to manipulate people and to critically evaluate the purpose and intention behind certain narratives.
Dom Lucre's Tunnel Investigation
Dom Lucre has built a big following on X (1 million followers) and has now dubbed himself "The breaker of narratives".
On January 31, he released a "Tunnel Investigation" short film (https://twitter.com/dom_lucre/status/1752515648905765363).
🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: Every year, over 1,000 children go missing in the State of New York, and many are never found. New York is ranked 5th in the nation in child abductions. The State also has one of the most extensive tunnel systems in the country, with almost 1,000 tunnels reaching across the entire state. Many are secret.
On January 8th, 2024, clashes broke out at the World Headquarters of the Chabad-Lubavitch Synagogue in Brooklyn New York- known as the “770”.
Footage leaking from the clash revealed that there were secret tunnels dug beneath the synagogue, and millions witnessed the extremely alarming images coming from the videos: a book covered in blood, a child’s highchair, and a soiled mattress.
With reports of widespread cases of child sex abuse occurring within the Chabad; theories began to spread about the true purpose of these tunnels.
Last week, in partnership with Truth Army Films, I went to New York to investigate not only the Chabad Tunnels, but also the underground network of tunnels that run underneath the entire state of New York.
Now, we are releasing our findings to the world.
Watch ‘The Tunnels’ FULL documentary HERE:
Time Stamps:
2:40 - The Unsealed Chabad Tunnel
5:19 - Symbolism in tipped off tunnel
12:53 - Dom Lucre and Truth Army Enters The 770 Chabad Synagogue
6:17 - Child Sex Abuse Victim of The Chabad Synagogue
18:26 - Dom Lucre and Truth Army Films Get Kicked out The 770 Chabad
22:19 - Dom Lucre speaks to the New York locals About Child Trafficking
26:42 - Final Tunnel/Closing
But in this film, there is a rather problematic section starting at 6:17.
https://twitter.com/dom_lucre/status/1752515648905765363
Jordan Sather comments:
But for 6 minutes of this film, Dom Lucre "interviews" an Australian man named Manny Waks who gives testimony of child abuse he received when part of an ultra-orthodox synagogue.
Problem is - DOM LUCE DIDN'T INTERVIEW HIM.
Dom and his production team took Waks video and fabricated a set to make it look like Waks was talking to Dom. Manny Waks is disgusted how his testimony was used in this film. He had never heard of Dom Lucre before. How disgusting to make this man's vulnerable testimony and slap it into this shoddy production.
Dom has a history of stealing content and acting like it's his own.
This whole film appears to be a massive money and clickbait grift. Who cares about the truth when you want to be popular, right Dom Lucrative? Engagement is all that matters!
(https://t.me/jordansather/9898)
Waks himself responded to the Dom Lucre film this way:
A shoddy and outrageous piece of “journalism”…for the record, I’m completely distancing myself from Dom’s nonsense. I didn’t give him an interview and I’m appalled that he’s using this unrelated interview for his conspiracy theory.
https://twitter.com/mannywaks/status/1753114223159500813
As someone else tweeted:
@dom_lucre you got som'splainin' to do
@trutharmyfilms you said it was a real interview.... You want to explain yourself now?
Lessons and takeaways
We are living in the midst of a psy-war. In the psy-war, everything revolves around information - true information, fake information, distorted information, information used for purposes as varying as exploitation, manipulation, control and liberation.
One wonders why Lucre and his film team were so willing to insert a section of information that presents a very false impression. Notice how the time in the section is spent focusing on Lucre himself. Apart from creating the impression that he is interviewing Waks, it also makes Lucre himself a feature and aspect of the film.
Why? We expect this sort of behavior from MSM hacks like 60 minutes, but if Dom is truly about exposing truth, then why this?
It's hard to not wonder if Lucre is more interested in his own agenda than the actual truth agenda. He could have easily set the content up in a manner that does NOT create the illusion that he is interviewing the man. Why didn't he?
Perhaps because the interview content has nothing whatsoever to do with New York, or even the USA.
Again, Sather posts:
Manny Waks isn't even from New York, his testimony is related to events that happened in Melbourne, Australia.
How is it relevant to throw his video into this documentary about tunnels in New York?
Plus, nearly every large metropolis has tunnel systems underneath it. And the whole recent Chabad tunnel fiasco in New York didn't have child trafficking going on.
Human trafficking = necessary to expose, but not in shoddy, clickbait ways like this.
Dom is acting like he's doing so much to "expose human trafficking" - when in reality... he's not doing that much. Just fabricating empty conspiracies for popularity. Nasty grift from a lazy "reporter"
https://t.me/jordansather/9900
For me, this situation highlights what to me is an important realization:
The landscape of the narrative war, the psywar, is not simply black and white, or up and down, as if there are only TWO monolithic factions vying for supremacy.
In addition to deep state / Cabal operations that are attempting to perpetuate and defend the Cabal control on the narratives, there are also myriad other actors whose agenda may neither be to support the DS or fight against them. Think opportunistic black marketeers who exploit the chaos and vulnerabilities generated by war.
Moreover, even among the exploiters, some of these will merely be self-interested opportunists, but others may also be Cabal disinfo operations disguised as self-interested grifters, etc. It's important to realize this and keep one's sense of skepticism alive.
Whether you conclude that Lucre is a grifting 'lazy reporter', or someone caught up in his own hype, or a truth warrior who screwed up here, the real point is to pay attention to who you listen to and ALWAYS apply your own critical thinking to the information that comes across your screen, and question your OWN conclusions.
Such a practice is key to the goals of the Q operation.
Q2816
The DECLASSIFICATION of all requested documents (+ more) will occur. This is not a game.
Do not let personal (emotional) desires ("do it now""now""what is taking so long""NOW!") take over.
Logical thinking and strategy should always be applied.
Game-Theory.
I don’t trust Jordan Sather as well, to me that is a glass house comment. Honestly I have a rule, I do not get emotionally attached or take anything said by these large “digital” personas to heart. I look at their theories/ evidence, read the comments, follow the links, if important enough continue to dig around and see if there is validity. Then draw my own conclusion. I know none of these people personally and I believe strongly we are truly watching a movie. I figure I’ll know who’s who in the zoo when the credits roll. Until then, we pray for discernment and wisdom everyday and hope God sees fit to bless us in such a way. Just MHO.
Personally I have yet to see Sather call out anyone who wasn't already sussy as hell. Dom and Ariel were heavily featured on his last episode of "Clickbait of the Week". All I tend to see is people getting butthurt that he called out their favorite bullshit artist hopium dealer.
I'm always struck by the "I don't trust X" comments. I don't really understand pedes who view this world or the psywar via this lens.
For example, my reference in the post to Sather is because he provided a heads up on this topic (brought it to my attention). Also, I find Sather very credible in his approach - I have similar interests - and I find many of his thoughts about things resonate. (and I also think he is working in a much neglected area of the Truth sphere). But do I "trust" him? For what?
What is there to trust here? What Sather does or does not isn't materially going to impact my life, or my decisions, so where does "trust" even come in to it?
IMO, it's far more important to learn to trust our own capacity to discern and evaluate. I feel like pedes who lead with the "I don't trust X" or "I don't trust Y" thinking perhaps haven't yet learned to trust their own discernment.
Which is OK really, because discernment is a muscle that requires growth, development and muscle-building, but recognizing this is sometimes the hard part.
I agree with much of what you've said, except perhaps the movie motif, which granted, is widely used and means different things to different people.
Maturity of heart and discernment, which includes and involves developing emotional maturity, is much less likely to attach to personas and more likely to relate to ways of thinking, approaches, and histories.
But a lot of folks focus on the personas, and that I think is a mistake.
I would disagree about personas and my own opinion is that discernment involves evaluating the messenger along with his message, especially in this point in time.
Trust is a matter of investing my time in what you have to offer.
The war we are in has everything to do with infiltrators and plants intending to manipulate and corral the narrative. For instance every FBI informant program infiltrating probably every patriot group that exists along with the entirety of Hollywood and the mockingbird media regarding information and narrative seeding.
Personas are a layer to the deception and created intentionally to target a specific audience, Which, in my opinion, when personalities are presented in a forefront manner, should be an immediate red flag.
The CAA and the complete manipulation they have over damn near all things broadcast, televised and presented as news, pop culture or reality is the number one enemy in this chapter of the book.
You don’t think they know how to make someone look like a little guy who is organic and grass roots?
Remember sometimes it’s not the truth that is presented, it’s the truth that was intentionally left out that leads you off the trail and because you trusted them as your hound dog, the chase ends there.
Just the way I see it.
Wow. What an insightful comment! Excellent.
Perhaps I could have phrased my comment differently because it reads like I'm saying personalities and personas are irrelevant. Not at all! As your astute comment highlights.
What I meant by 'focus' was really 'attachment'. Don't attach to personas, as if they are the answer to what you are looking for.
I think a lot of folks get caught up in (attached to) the persona, when very often its a projection, and image. As you say "Personas are a layer to the deception and created intentionally to target a specific audience."
I could say more, but your comment stands alone.
Excellent.
Agreed
I think most of us have also experienced it first hand at this point and are now a little more patient and diligent in our assessments.
Either way, I think that the healthiest approach, is to throw anything and everything on the table to hash it out to test it’s worth.
I think it's very important to keep our truth/bs detectors well honed. That's our number 1 job. Number 2 job is understanding what we are seeing.
That's what I love about this platform. Many people chewing on the same information and sharing their understanding of what's going on.
We have our job to do. Our 1st priority of course is our allegiance with God. From there all good things are possible.
Damn! You ARE good!
Lol...☺️
I'm with you on not trusting Jordan Sather. I was following him very early in his career on YT when the Q drops were coming out and really liked him. But over time, the pattern I saw was that Jordan gets sent in to blow up people who are building a following. He was in the movie that David Wilcock and others did (the two guys Ben and ?, can't think of their channel at the moment), Above Majestic, and then afterwards Jordan shits all over David Wilcock. I know lots of people here don't like DW, but I would wager that none of those people who dis him all the time have read The Source Field Investigations, which is a solid piece of work.
Jordan Sather is controlled by somebody in my opinion. And I don't think it's the good guys. Just my opinion.
Edge of Wonder.
I too was in on the infancy days of Sather, found him more relevant back then.
https://castbox.fm/episode/Ep.-23---Ben-and-Rob-from-Edge-of-Wonder-id4354036-id398000367?country=us
PS. As far as I know, the boys from Edge of Wonder teamed up with Seth from Man in America to set up a paid for content media operation. Cannot recall the name, and I haven't listened to Seth for more than two years.
I liked his content in the beginning, but drifted away from it.
Glad to have your opinion!
But I disagree. Which is fine, cos that's what having opinions are all about.
Here's how I would see it: Sather has a style and personality that rubs some people the wrong way. He's a work in progress (like all of us) and I think he's matured significantly over the period of the last 7 years.
But there are VERY few people in the Awakening who are making the effort to challenge the clickbait / grifter / fake / disinfo infiltrations and activities in the Awakening, and for that reason, I think Sather has an important niche.
Doesn't mean he's right all the time, and doesn't mean his personal opinions are gold. But the busting of myths, and the calling out of fakes, clickbaiters and such, is a very important part of continually maintaining the health of the movement, so I like him. And I do not think he's controlled.
But, like you, that's just my opinion.
PS: Ben Chasteen, Rob Counts
Yes! Ben & Rob. I used to watch their shows quite a lot. I enjoyed them. No time these days. I remember back when Jordan Sather was one of the only ones consistently putting out content about the Q drops and how hard it was to find awake people back then, so I was very grateful for Jordan back then. The style and personality you talk about in Jordan strikes me as arrogance. And throughout this Great Awakening, what I have noticed is the hardcore TDS people, vaccine-pushing people, pronoun-obsessed people, never-Trump neocon shills all have one thing in common: arrogance. They're so sure they're right that they miss info that would suggest otherwise. This is probably why I now mostly ignore Jordan Sather. He's arrogant. And pride goeth before a fall. Perhaps I am judging Jordan on his past and not his present. Certainly possible. I even hope that's the case. The more voices for truth out there, the better. And I'm all for the exposing of shills. I just don't like when innocent people who have a body of work to show their honest intentions get slandered by arrogant people who climb the fame ladder that way. I appreciate your response. Nice to have a rational discussion where two people can exchange information and agree to disagree. Now I have your perspective to weigh into my assessment of Jordan next time I run into his stuff. Thank you.
Most welcome, fren.
It's the best. Because it creates stereoscopic vision, where two contrasting perspectives interacting can yield than on perspective alone.
You may be right there. It might well be a blind spot. On the other hand, he calls things out as he sees them, and cops lots of flak for it, so sometimes it takes a harsh personality to dive through the jungle.
If he's a diamond, then he's much more a diamond in the rough. Anyway, for whatever reason, I don't have an issue with this aspect of his character.
I listened to the boys from Edge of Wonder quite a bit up until the time they were purged from youtube. Their willingness to approach topics without attaching too much to their own opinions on those topics was pretty good.
What I liked most, however, was their angles on China and the CCP. For me, that helped to open my eyes to certain aspects of China that I still find useful today. (For example, the conflicts between the Xi faction based in beijing and the Zhang (?) faction based in Shanghai, etc.)
I look forward to the possibility of reviewing more of the 'influencers' with you and getting your angle on those....