I think so. So far the democrats have refused to allow any challengers to Joe. Pretty undemocratic in my opinion. It just shows the corruption that exists with our "two party" system.
The parties select their nominees, not the people.
The people only get to vote on who the parties select. This is how the parties (uni-party) has controlled elections for so long.
Then a guy with billions, who could self fund his campaign, showed up, and all hell broke loose with "the system."
What could really be interesting is if this guy beats Joe in the primary in WI. Joe and the D's will have some explaining to do!
Perfect! Now the Dems will have someone other than Haley to vote for! We should print up signs promoting Dean Phillips, just to give them a reason not to mess around in the Republican primary!
I haven't followed this story. But didn't some states (Florida?) somehow manage to keep challengers to biden off the ballot? Does anybody have any info on that? Thank you.
Is this a good thing?
I think so. So far the democrats have refused to allow any challengers to Joe. Pretty undemocratic in my opinion. It just shows the corruption that exists with our "two party" system.
The parties select their nominees, not the people.
The people only get to vote on who the parties select. This is how the parties (uni-party) has controlled elections for so long.
Then a guy with billions, who could self fund his campaign, showed up, and all hell broke loose with "the system."
What could really be interesting is if this guy beats Joe in the primary in WI. Joe and the D's will have some explaining to do!
Perfect! Now the Dems will have someone other than Haley to vote for! We should print up signs promoting Dean Phillips, just to give them a reason not to mess around in the Republican primary!
I haven't followed this story. But didn't some states (Florida?) somehow manage to keep challengers to biden off the ballot? Does anybody have any info on that? Thank you.
Irrelevant remark, the dang nose on this guy! Sheesh