While news organizations are a private entity, the so call journalist are suppose to adhere to an ethical standard of their trade.
Freedom of the press. I think an argument could be made that a commercial private entity whose purpose is not to report news consistent with journalistic ethics, but instead in funded for sole purpose of spewing propaganda, is not "the press" at all.
journalist are suppose to adhere to an ethical standard of their trade.
Sure. That doesn't mean they have to research/interview/promote any specific story. Whichever story they choose to write/talk about though should still be within the confines of ethical standards.
Tucker has the freedom to promote it, and he's doing so on one of the most popular social media channels in the world.
Talks/interviews/interaction etc etc should have already occurred and let the public know where the “other side” stands.
Thought you had a 109 day account here. That doesn’t really matter You carry on fren, no offenses intended, we’re just seeing the same thing from opposite sides.
...you can't have the info of something that hasn't happened yet. I'm not sure what you're requiring here.
I've also been here since the beginning of the site, and was part of it when it was still on reddit.
The Code of ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists seem to agree with u/DRan.
While news organizations are a private entity, the so call journalist are suppose to adhere to an ethical standard of their trade.
Freedom of the press. I think an argument could be made that a commercial private entity whose purpose is not to report news consistent with journalistic ethics, but instead in funded for sole purpose of spewing propaganda, is not "the press" at all.
Sure. That doesn't mean they have to research/interview/promote any specific story. Whichever story they choose to write/talk about though should still be within the confines of ethical standards.
Tucker has the freedom to promote it, and he's doing so on one of the most popular social media channels in the world.
Nothing to disagree with here.
So the way I see, there’s no real free speech infringement at play here
Talks/interviews/interaction etc etc should have already occurred and let the public know where the “other side” stands.
Thought you had a 109 day account here. That doesn’t really matter You carry on fren, no offenses intended, we’re just seeing the same thing from opposite sides.
Let’s see how this interview goes.
We don't know if Tucker ever asked Putin to do an interview before.
This account is 109 days old but I've had other accounts.