I understand that but that’s not what’s happening here. The government is clearly letting him speak on one of the world’s largest social media platforms.
Then we have nothing to discuss. The thread began with a distinction between platforms and publishers and their respective rights and responsibilities.
I understand that but that’s not what’s happening here. The government is clearly letting him speak on one of the world’s largest social media platforms.
Then we have nothing to discuss. The thread began with a distinction between platforms and publishers and their respective rights and responsibilities.
Yep. But the sore point is that internet hosts claim to be platforms, when they are mostly publishers. Not a problem in this case.
…then what’s the point in the whole “free speech” irony?