So simultaneously, the DNC and RNC are private corporations who can nominate and deny anyone they want from their ballots, and also the only way to get on the election ballot is by being the put-forth DNC or RNC candidate?
If we have codified sauce on that, which I’ve been thinking about throwing in the face of dems as the means by which Bernie was denied, it’s a huge red pill, and should obviously be criminal racketeering/subversion.
I.e. “if you don’t let us handle the money that’s sent to your campaign, we won’t let you be on the ballot, without any regard for how many ‘votes’ you get.”
So simultaneously, the DNC and RNC are private corporations who can nominate and deny anyone they want from their ballots, and also the only way to get on the election ballot is by being the put-forth DNC or RNC candidate?
If we have codified sauce on that, which I’ve been thinking about throwing in the face of dems as the means by which Bernie was denied, it’s a huge red pill, and should obviously be criminal racketeering/subversion.
I.e. “if you don’t let us handle the money that’s sent to your campaign, we won’t let you be on the ballot, without any regard for how many ‘votes’ you get.”
Agreed there seems to be potential for a case there.