The Q quote above is telegraphing specific plans and events. I very much doubt it is real.
From Q:
Why have there been no arrests?
Why have 'specific' dates been mentioned only to see no action?
Define 'game theory'.
Why must disinformation be provided?
Define 'open source'.
Define 'public purview'.
Do we let our enemies walk through the front door?
From Sun Tzu:
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win
Any operation that was planned that is "iffy" (outcome unknown), has already happened. That part of the war is long over. Everything since then has been theatre.
Whether people like it or not, every single event that has occurred on the world stage from at least 2020 (Covid, vaccine, Lahaina, Ukraine, etc.), and probably before, has been under Q control. Did they "let it happen" or "cause it?" While those may seem like valid questions to some, I suggest they aren't really important. They are only used to justify a personal sense of morality. They fall into the "would you kill to save" type of questions. Like, "would you personally kill one person to save two people? How about 10? How about a million? At some point you realize that these types of decisions must be made in order to win. That is what Game Theory is all about, and Q talks about it a lot... for a reason.
I think this is smoke and mirrors.
From Sun Tzu:
The Q quote above is telegraphing specific plans and events. I very much doubt it is real.
From Q:
From Sun Tzu:
Any operation that was planned that is "iffy" (outcome unknown), has already happened. That part of the war is long over. Everything since then has been theatre.
Whether people like it or not, every single event that has occurred on the world stage from at least 2020 (Covid, vaccine, Lahaina, Ukraine, etc.), and probably before, has been under Q control. Did they "let it happen" or "cause it?" While those may seem like valid questions to some, I suggest they aren't really important. They are only used to justify a personal sense of morality. They fall into the "would you kill to save" type of questions. Like, "would you personally kill one person to save two people? How about 10? How about a million? At some point you realize that these types of decisions must be made in order to win. That is what Game Theory is all about, and Q talks about it a lot... for a reason.
I think this is likely the best they could do.