So I watched the Tucker Putin interview and these are my thought, what's yours?
I was sort of disappointed that there was no new information, pretty much everything discussed we already knew about (at least here on this board). But I don't really have a perspective on this in terms of normie people. They have been bombarded with propaganda from US and NATO since day 1.
I almost think he should have split the interview into 2 pieces; Putin went off on a tangent right away with a history lesson of Russia and Ukraine which came off as pretty boring, and I think a lot of newcomers would have lost interest right then and there. Most of it I already knew, and what I didn't already know was certainly interesting, but I think most people would have lost interest pretty quickly.
I was disappointed that they did not even touch on US bio-labs and human trafficking. But I guess I can understand why. They did touch on Nordstream, and who did it, but overall I think the interview was pretty tame. Anything that could be even remotely construed as controversial I think came from Tucker, like "Do you think Zelensky is even allowed to try and negotiate?"
One thing that seemed clear was that US leaders are "not in control". They did touch on possible negotiations between Russia and the US that seemed possible, but then unelected bureaucrats from US agencies put the brakes on that. That was certainly interesting. But other than that, all pretty tame. What do you think?
Putin provided a VERY brief synopsis of the history of of the "ukraine region" (intentional non capitalization) because most Americans do not understand that Niece pledged allegiance to the Tsars in exchange for protection from the Pope and Polish oppression of the Orthodox Church. These requests and agreements AR what I believe to be in the folder that was passed over (very publically). There aren't many writings a valuable in the U.S. documenting the evolution of Russian History. Putin is bestowing a gift of documents held in confidence to an outside interviewer who comes across as coarse and uniformed.... Hence Tucker's introductory statement.