I recall in one of the globalist documents (forget which ones) that they wanted to push women's sports, which is kinda suspect bc why would the UN or WEF or whatever want women in sports? I think it's just a social engineering / conditioning type of agenda.
Sports like swimming, volleyball, track and field, gymnastics involve women being scantily clad so it makes it normal for women to show off their bodies but under the cover of sports. And this is done to even to underage girls. So this brainwashes / brutalizes the women thinking it is normal to dress like a whore and gets them used to dressing like whores and it influences women who watch them on TV to dress like whores. And also the boys will be further brainwashed / brutalize into sexualizing women bc how could they not given what they are being presented with on national TV??
This is genius bc it leverages male and female nature against them: women love attention (so dress like a whore) and men are visual (watch dem hos).
Girl should not be paraded on TV as whores, they should be protected and cherished as future wives and mothers. This solves the trannys in women's sports issue.
It's a giant psyop and social engineering. Ban women's sports.
No.
Women should be encouraged to participate in athletics as part of fitness, competition, and sportsmanship.
They dress that way generally because they want to and it usually isn't like a "whore" as you assert.
My wife went to college on scholarship, playing volleyball and softball. To this day she works to maintain some degree of fitness. (over 50) These are good habits to make.
Don't let these globalists bastards win by destroying women's sports.
Now women's professional sports is another matter altogether. There should generally not be equal pay because women simply can't compete with men in the vast majority of cases. One exception is women officials. Women see far more than men and women remember far more than men. This would be an area to make the best use of their natural abilities.
What’s your basis of the ‘see more’ and ‘remember more’ claims? I’ve heard that men have better eyesight at distance and better depth perception but women are better able to differentiate between subtle hues. Hunting vs gathering.
There was a test that was done on men and women which; unfortunately, I can't google up for the life of me. One at a time, men and women were put into a holding room with various items. They were told they were being put there before going into another room where the actual test would be given. Well, the holding room was the test location. After being placed into the holding room for a set amount of time, the men and women were questioned what they saw in the room and women could recall more items in the room than men. Like you implied, women make good gatherers.
I think in general, IMO, men are able to focus more deeply on one thing than women (we go into mission mode; hunting mode), but women are able to juggle multiple things where men can't. (cooking dinner while carrying the child while talking on the phone)
I suppose the items were removed from view before the subjects were questioned about the items. While the items were in view, where the subjects ever told that they would be questioned about the items later? If there was no explicit incentive to memorize the items, then I suspect the study was testing something besides memory.
In NFL refereeing, there are so many of them that each one has a specific focus. The most multi-tasking that their field of vision requires is limited to the length of a player. For example, how far his hands are extending the ball as his foot steps on the sideline. People of either sex can be trained to track concurrently the locations of a couple things that are only a few feet apart, and on the close calls there is technological assistance.
They were not told that they would be questioned later about the items.