I see what you're saying but that is the way the elites look at it, breaking the populace down by how much pressure was needed.
It might be seen as insensitive to some but it does separate people by their reticence or lack of it. They now know 50% just follow orders and that is the slim majority. They know if something threatens their entertainment they get 70%, the true majority.
Before they had small focus groups, 2000-5000 people on average, (plus or minus margin of error) but they did it on a global scale and got an accurate reading.
Politicians only look to appease the majority, in focus groups they choose which words to use and finalise on the one that the largest majority find acceptable or agree with.
Yeah, that part of her analysis is spot-on, the levels of stimulus-reaction/results. It's just that she then proceeds to insult the people at each stage. Callous, mostly because her points are valid without the insults.
I understand, for some its a badge of honour whereas some people are disappointed at those who went along with it and a lot of people are angry still how the majority turned on the unvaccinated with threats of being put in camps, forced injections, loss of livelihood, friends, family and freedom.
Its a scary prospect that billions of people pumped up with propaganda and self righteousness will turn against the ones that actually care and are warning them. Emotions are still high from that.
Don't take it personally as you are here and know now, we still have people that want to bury their head in the sand and will be deceived again and each time they will be pushed further in 'us against them', she's saying they are stupid enough to do that.
Thanks, fren. No worries, though, as I'm still pure except for the childhood shots I didn't choose. I guess I'm just more sympathetic towards the flock in the other pasture.
I see what you're saying but that is the way the elites look at it, breaking the populace down by how much pressure was needed.
It might be seen as insensitive to some but it does separate people by their reticence or lack of it. They now know 50% just follow orders and that is the slim majority. They know if something threatens their entertainment they get 70%, the true majority.
Before they had small focus groups, 2000-5000 people on average, (plus or minus margin of error) but they did it on a global scale and got an accurate reading.
Politicians only look to appease the majority, in focus groups they choose which words to use and finalise on the one that the largest majority find acceptable or agree with.
Yeah, that part of her analysis is spot-on, the levels of stimulus-reaction/results. It's just that she then proceeds to insult the people at each stage. Callous, mostly because her points are valid without the insults.
I understand, for some its a badge of honour whereas some people are disappointed at those who went along with it and a lot of people are angry still how the majority turned on the unvaccinated with threats of being put in camps, forced injections, loss of livelihood, friends, family and freedom.
Its a scary prospect that billions of people pumped up with propaganda and self righteousness will turn against the ones that actually care and are warning them. Emotions are still high from that.
Don't take it personally as you are here and know now, we still have people that want to bury their head in the sand and will be deceived again and each time they will be pushed further in 'us against them', she's saying they are stupid enough to do that.
Thanks, fren. No worries, though, as I'm still pure except for the childhood shots I didn't choose. I guess I'm just more sympathetic towards the flock in the other pasture.