The vaccine was originally tested nearly a decade ago during the West African Ebola epidemic, where initial trial results indicated it could be 100% effective at preventing Ebola
No vaccine is 100% effective, and anyone who claims a vaccine is 100% effective is lying.
The new study was the first time that researchers calculated Ebola mortality among people who had received the vaccine and then experienced a breakthrough infection.
So even though the vaccine failed miserably, its still “100% effective” in clown world.
According to their analysis, the fatality rate among 423 participants who had received the vaccine was approximately 25%. Among unvaccinated participants, it was 56%.
100% effective?
The vaccine’s protective effect increased the longer a person had been vaccinated, with the mortality rate falling from 27% among participants vaccinated just 2 days or fewer from the onset of their symptoms to 18% among those who received the vaccine 10 days or more before they got sick.
In other words, the vaccine itself is causing ebola?
The results demonstrate that “vaccine failure is still compatible with high effectiveness,” the researchers wrote.
Vaccine quacks will do impressive mental gymnastics to maintain their delusional narratives
They listed several potential reasons other than primary vaccine failure for the more than 400 breakthrough infections identified during the study, including cold chain failure, inadequate dosing or injection technique, and immunosuppression.
Couldn’t possibly be that the vaccine is a miserable failure, and actually causes more ebola than it prevents…
“Our results reinforce the importance of vaccinating populations who are at risk of exposure to Ebola virus to reduce the risk of infection and — if infection occurs — the risk of death,” the researchers wrote.
No matter what the data actually show, their interpretation is always “safe and effective”
They get away with publishing this garbage because their audience is just as brainwashed as the authors are.
Most of your conclusions about their statements are correct (there's a lot of BS), but you are completely wrong to conclude that the vaccine is actually causing ebola. They compared people who had received the vaccine 10 or more days PRIOR TO BECOMING INFECTED to people who received the vaccine 2 or more days AFTER THEY WERE ALREADY INFECTED.
The vaccine will take a period of time to stimulate sufficient levels of antibody production, so you would expect people who received the vaccine pre-infection to have a lower mortality rate than people who didn't receive the vaccine until after they were already infected and beginning to show outward symptoms, and that is exactly what the data shows. It also shows that the mortality rate from receiving the vaccine after infection is significantly lower than not receiving it at all.
There is no mention of possible side efffects of the vaccine, so you would have to do a risk assessment of the possible side effects of the vaccine vs dying from ebola. Ebola is a pretty fucking horrible way to die, to be honest I'm not sure I can think of a worse way to die off the top of my head. That's probably why they seem to be planning to use Ebola or another hemorrhagic virus for their next attempt at mass genocide.
While I think that anyone who took even a single COVID jab is an utter fool, I could understand and forgive people who live in areas of Africa where ebola outbreaks occur if they decided to risk even the worst potential side effects of a vaccine in the hopes of avoiding a horrible death from ebola.
What’s the name.
In the beginning of Covid the fear porn was massive, I can’t find fault in those that got it at the beginning. After that I will agree with them being fools
What's the name of what?
Name of the Ebola vaccine, name is Remdesivir. 6 countries in Africa banned it cause it killed more people than it saved. Causes kidney and liver failure