We need to be paying very close attention to A.I. and A.G.I.

It goes without saying that AI is probably here to stay in some form. Like it or not. Anyone who can afford to develop models. By necessity needs to or risk being squeezed out of the market in the case of companies, or open themselves to attack in the case of nation states.

And at the moment it’s a tool like any other that can be used for good or evil. Energy when AI is brought up at the moment is frequently spent on worrying about Clickbait AI Doomsday Scenarios. Imagining some fantasy scenario where the world gives up AI en-mass. Or imagining some sort of Utopian post-scarcity existence built on the backs of AI and Robots. Instead of confronting and finding solutions to the very real problems it’s introduction could and is causing. And honestly evaluating the benefits it can and is bringing.

Won’t venture to guess about AGI. As that’s one of those things that has its definition change periodically and the goal posts move. According to some of the earliest barely defined notions of AGI for instance. ChatGPT and it’s many assorted clones have already passed that benchmark.

permalink save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q