Well, you’re the one who is sticking up for the post. You never claimed to be a victim. You literally called me, Laura Ingalls, for actually sticking up for you. ?
If that’s the case, you should be agreeing with me. But you’re not. Do you think it’s a funny joke. Sorry you were abused I just find it interesting that you’re going to stick up for a post, pointing out, children, being abused, and you’re one of them. It is if you have Stockholm syndrome.
But then, again, your username has the word fiasco with it, so it all makes sense.
My first comment was a reinactment of my grandfather and I. If you read my comment then you would have known I didn't say I got my children. That's why I made the victim shaming joke
And I don't think of myself as a victim. Because I'm not./
And I'm not "sticking up" for a post for God sake, I'm pointing out that the message is true-kids were much tougher back then.
Whether you think that's a good thing or a bad thing is completely subjective.
And Donnie Fiasco is just a play on Donnie Brasco. That's really all.
There’s something in between you know. This is how people do their arguments. They argue for extremes.
There’s a really cool channel out there on YouTube. It’s called chicken Ricky. Basically, it’s a father who is teaching his son, who I think it’s somewhere between seven and nine how to work on vehicles, mow yards, and be a productive human
That’s the kind of kid I’m talking about. Check it out and learn.
You don’t have to beat your kids into submission to have a strong son. Also, you don’t have to be so soft that they turn into soy boys. Raising a son like chicken Ricky is something to aspire to.
No I don’t. I never said that. Those are words that you came up with.There’s a difference between spanking as a result of a a brief correction - than actual abuse. (hitting a child because they won’t stop crying)
There’s only one person who spanked me as a child, that was my grandmother. I had a great deal of respect for her. Quite frankly, I should’ve had a few more spankings. So now I’m not against corporal punishment.
However, if we would like to back to the beginning of why, all of this conversation started….
The meme posted, it’s more supportive abusive behavior.
If you don’t stop, crying, I’ll give you something to cry about.
This is a horrible way to treat a child. Threatening to hit a child, after they’ve already been punished, is cruel and abusive. All it does is teach a child to be afraid of their parents, because if they do cry, they’re going to get hit again. What kind of father or mother would treat a child like that? Someone who’s been abused themselves!
It also teachers a child that it’s not OK to cry. That’s another abusive tactic for a parent to use. Yes people cry, and it’s OK. I’m not talking about screeching, and throwing a tantrum…. But yes, when a child gets in trouble and gets spanked, they’re going to cry. Sometimes they are just crying because they know they did something wrong, and they’re being held accountable. That’s fine that’s what supposed to happen.
Learning how to discipline your children is a very important lesson for parents. The fact that there are so many here that are upset by my words, tells me those people haven’t learned how to do that yet.
There’s a couple great resources for raising kids. One of them is called Growing Kids, God’s Way, and the other is called the One Minute Father. If you’re using either of these methods, you shouldn’t have to spank your kids. However; sometimes it is necessary.
Threatening a child that you’re going to abuse them so they’ll stop crying is the stupidest thing ever. I just picture somebody who wants to get back to drinking their beer and smoking a cigarette.
In other words, shut the fuck up or I’ll hit you again. 🤷♀️
Yes, I will because I don’t think abusing your child is the way to get them to be disciplined.
But you keep beating your kids.
I think you should be accusing my grandfather of abusing me since I am the one who was hit.
Way to shame the victim.
Well, you’re the one who is sticking up for the post. You never claimed to be a victim. You literally called me, Laura Ingalls, for actually sticking up for you. ?
If that’s the case, you should be agreeing with me. But you’re not. Do you think it’s a funny joke. Sorry you were abused I just find it interesting that you’re going to stick up for a post, pointing out, children, being abused, and you’re one of them. It is if you have Stockholm syndrome.
But then, again, your username has the word fiasco with it, so it all makes sense.
God bless you and have a great day.
My first comment was a reinactment of my grandfather and I. If you read my comment then you would have known I didn't say I got my children. That's why I made the victim shaming joke
And I don't think of myself as a victim. Because I'm not./
And I'm not "sticking up" for a post for God sake, I'm pointing out that the message is true-kids were much tougher back then.
Whether you think that's a good thing or a bad thing is completely subjective.
And Donnie Fiasco is just a play on Donnie Brasco. That's really all.
Love you too
Better than having a bunch of pansy-ass kids, pretending to be gangsters, eating soap pods and seeing their therapists for a broken nail.
There’s something in between you know. This is how people do their arguments. They argue for extremes.
There’s a really cool channel out there on YouTube. It’s called chicken Ricky. Basically, it’s a father who is teaching his son, who I think it’s somewhere between seven and nine how to work on vehicles, mow yards, and be a productive human
That’s the kind of kid I’m talking about. Check it out and learn.
You don’t have to beat your kids into submission to have a strong son. Also, you don’t have to be so soft that they turn into soy boys. Raising a son like chicken Ricky is something to aspire to.
https://youtu.be/5_2OQ3NkYpk?si=GQgOz8pNxxSfNB_S
You assume that every parent that spanks their kids is an abuser. You're wrong.
No I don’t. I never said that. Those are words that you came up with.There’s a difference between spanking as a result of a a brief correction - than actual abuse. (hitting a child because they won’t stop crying)
There’s only one person who spanked me as a child, that was my grandmother. I had a great deal of respect for her. Quite frankly, I should’ve had a few more spankings. So now I’m not against corporal punishment.
However, if we would like to back to the beginning of why, all of this conversation started….
The meme posted, it’s more supportive abusive behavior.
If you don’t stop, crying, I’ll give you something to cry about.
This is a horrible way to treat a child. Threatening to hit a child, after they’ve already been punished, is cruel and abusive. All it does is teach a child to be afraid of their parents, because if they do cry, they’re going to get hit again. What kind of father or mother would treat a child like that? Someone who’s been abused themselves!
It also teachers a child that it’s not OK to cry. That’s another abusive tactic for a parent to use. Yes people cry, and it’s OK. I’m not talking about screeching, and throwing a tantrum…. But yes, when a child gets in trouble and gets spanked, they’re going to cry. Sometimes they are just crying because they know they did something wrong, and they’re being held accountable. That’s fine that’s what supposed to happen.
Learning how to discipline your children is a very important lesson for parents. The fact that there are so many here that are upset by my words, tells me those people haven’t learned how to do that yet.
There’s a couple great resources for raising kids. One of them is called Growing Kids, God’s Way, and the other is called the One Minute Father. If you’re using either of these methods, you shouldn’t have to spank your kids. However; sometimes it is necessary.
Threatening a child that you’re going to abuse them so they’ll stop crying is the stupidest thing ever. I just picture somebody who wants to get back to drinking their beer and smoking a cigarette.
In other words, shut the fuck up or I’ll hit you again. 🤷♀️