Australian court rules: Employers that mandated COVID-19 injections for workers can be held LIABLE for vaccine injuries. Feb 12th, 2024.
(www.naturalnews.com)
🏆 - WINNING - 🏆
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Speaking as an employer, this sucks. I didn't mandate and fought the pressures for injections from my employees. But like how much knowledge is an employer expected to contain? I call employer anyone who has more good paying work to do than they can personally handle, so they hire someone else to help get the work done. That doesn't make them brilliant or a top notch lawyer, just someone with more to do than they can handle. Employer should be a simple occupation.
If you didn’t mandate your employees to get a experimental gene therapy, why would this bother you?
Your obviously not an employer. We worry bout everything.
I think your comment points to the reality that legalism in the form of statute law has gone rampant and out of control.
in common law, liability only pertains when you cause harm. But the so-called 'elites', who run the world from banks and use the legal system to subvert actual law, have made it extremely hard, if not impossible, for small businesses to manage all the liabilities that can potentially get thrown at them. It's not an issue for the massive corporations and owned subsidiaries, etc, because they will have endless funds and teams of lawyers to protect themselves and worm their way through all the traps, but smaller businesses simply cannot do that.
In other words, the system is rigged as much against small businesses - and small business owners / employers - as it is against the general population.
I think however, in this case, the exposure of the employers is completely justified. It sucks, indeed, if smaller employers get caught in the crossfire, but this situation and the crimes behind it all MUST be exposed.
Note that in this particular case, it was a GOVERNMENT AGENCY that forced the injuries.
South Australian Department of Child Protection (DCP)
This outcome will impact bigger and more corrupt elements of the system than it will the smaller, imo.
Thanks so much for your deeper understanding. My words were no so well thought out. The split within the firm whether to vax or not is something that never healed. It goes undiscussed, we muddle along getting the work done.
I hadn't realized this action was falling first on a government agency and the DCP specifically. That's ironic.
While I am not an employer, I still have to disagree. It’s completely justified. I almost had to leave my company due to mandates, and instead they just chose to discriminate against me and give me my own set of rules I had to follow as an “unvaccinated.” Essentially I was alienated. My family relies on me to put food on the table and I was having to weigh many options and it was pretty darn stressful.
But back to the point, if you mandated the experimental jabs to your employees, know how hard it was to find stable employment during that time, plus all the external pressures others felt - you deserve to be liable to any damages that occurred. If your hands are clean, then you should be proud you held the line and your employees should be proud to work for you.
It happened to me also. We didn't mandate anything but did socially distance and mask up for I can't remember how long. Thank God it's relaxing.