Australian court rules: Employers that mandated COVID-19 injections for workers can be held LIABLE for vaccine injuries. Feb 12th, 2024.
(www.naturalnews.com)
🏆 - WINNING - 🏆
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
I think your comment points to the reality that legalism in the form of statute law has gone rampant and out of control.
in common law, liability only pertains when you cause harm. But the so-called 'elites', who run the world from banks and use the legal system to subvert actual law, have made it extremely hard, if not impossible, for small businesses to manage all the liabilities that can potentially get thrown at them. It's not an issue for the massive corporations and owned subsidiaries, etc, because they will have endless funds and teams of lawyers to protect themselves and worm their way through all the traps, but smaller businesses simply cannot do that.
In other words, the system is rigged as much against small businesses - and small business owners / employers - as it is against the general population.
I think however, in this case, the exposure of the employers is completely justified. It sucks, indeed, if smaller employers get caught in the crossfire, but this situation and the crimes behind it all MUST be exposed.
Note that in this particular case, it was a GOVERNMENT AGENCY that forced the injuries.
South Australian Department of Child Protection (DCP)
This outcome will impact bigger and more corrupt elements of the system than it will the smaller, imo.
Thanks so much for your deeper understanding. My words were no so well thought out. The split within the firm whether to vax or not is something that never healed. It goes undiscussed, we muddle along getting the work done.
I hadn't realized this action was falling first on a government agency and the DCP specifically. That's ironic.