We could even use small-yield nukes to blast the canal into existence. One thing I learned when I served in the US military in Panama back in the day was that the Pacific ocean is 20cm higher than the Caribbean Sea, so without any locks, there would be a constant river flowing west to east.
Problems,
1)The nukes would kill too many cartel members near the border.
2)Gov. Newscam would make a killing charging passage fees.
3) Illegals would drown, causing WW condemnation.
4)All celebrities& politicians would have to give up all their assets to pay for the project.
The part I liked most is the last sentence. Kek! It totally destroys globalists concern about melting polar ice.
We could even use small-yield nukes to blast the canal into existence. One thing I learned when I served in the US military in Panama back in the day was that the Pacific ocean is 20cm higher than the Caribbean Sea, so without any locks, there would be a constant river flowing west to east.
Maybe add a few strategically to the San Andreas fault and give communifornia a nudge west...put it out of our misery...win win win
Problems, 1)The nukes would kill too many cartel members near the border. 2)Gov. Newscam would make a killing charging passage fees. 3) Illegals would drown, causing WW condemnation. 4)All celebrities& politicians would have to give up all their assets to pay for the project.