This masking technique does not pass the standards of forensic facial wrinkle mapping tests, and does not address the audio forensics aspect of the issue.

It is important to note that digital manipulation may not be a concern, but rather the accuracy of the appearance in real-life situations. This is the crux.

It is essential to consider that silicone, while commonly used in masks, does not possess the same qualities as human skin. Claims suggesting otherwise are inaccurate. Close observation of silicone masks can reveal differences in texture and appearance compared to real skin. The intricacies of human facial features, such as fine wrinkles and natural folds, are not accurately replicated with silicone. Achieving a truly realistic human likeness with flexible materials remains a challenge due to limitations in texture, flexibility, and detail. The effectiveness of combining makeup and silicone to create a generic appearance diminishes upon closer inspection and lacks the authenticity required to pass facial wrinkle mapping tests.

Ultimately, one can choose between obtaining a precise and authentic representation of a person's face, akin to a wax figure, or settling for an inaccurate but partially realistic and flexible depiction. It is not possible to achieve both simultaneously.

Let's use reason, and logic to determine what is more plausible given evidence that his audio and his wrinkle mapping both pass forensics tests. Is it more likely that he is utilizing completely new and advanced technology to look real, while at the same time not the same? or is it more logical that he passes these tests because he is the same human?

What benefits are derived from utilizing an actor to portray a negative character, inciting conflicts, and deaths? If the actor is under the control of the white hats, who ultimately bears responsibility for the resulting bloodshed? Is it acceptable to justify acts of violence, border incursions, and prolonged detainment of individuals involved in the January 6th events as long as they are orchestrated by the white hats? Do the ends truly justify the means? Alternatively, is it possible that while the white hats possess necessary information and control similar to a skilled chess player, the true perpetrators of atrocities remain the true culprits regardless of manipulation? What makes more sense?