Utah’s New ‘Sovereignty Act’ Will Overrule the Federal Government, Constitutional?
A bill recently signed into law in Utah sets up a process for the state to overrule or otherwise ignore federal rules and decisions. I post a musical tribute below. See if you can guess it.
The constitution clearly lists all areas under Federal control. Anything outside that is state's rights.
From the article:
Thank you. I understand a fight on certain areas. Let's see what happen there.
But this seems to be in the right spirit if states' rights, esp after all the egregious overreach the past years
Yes. States taking back their powers
Which is pretty much anything the people in charge want it to be.
The Necessary and Proper Clause
This is a carte blanche addition, and the founders knew it. Hamilton (a London Banker shill), along with several others pushed for it and it became a part of the Enumerated Powers. It was this clause that was specifically left out of the Articles of Confederation of the original United States for exactly the reason that Hamilton et al pushed to create a new government with this added in.
That it got in, that they got rid of the previous version of the United States and created a new governmental corporation specifically to include this clause is just one of the many pieces of fuckery put into the Constitution that ensured that we would end up exactly where we are today.
Almost as if it were planned.
The Great Experiment.
First, I agree that America was a "Great Experiment" and was a creation of the Freemasons, but, it didnt exactly work out as they had hoped for, but let's come back to it later.
Not withstanding the Scotus ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland, the clause itself is very tight. It clearly constrains the scope of "make all Laws" to "Execution the foregoing Powers" and "all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States" making the scope clearly limited to the enumerated powers in Constitution.
That brings me back to the original point I was making about the Great Experiment. Yes, the Satanists had always dreamt of a country unconstrained by the God's Laws (which is what made the Monarchies so pesky to deal with at that time) where they can bring to fruition their experiments in Humanism - where Man can help Satan dethrone God and Satan would elevate his followers to the Throne.
However, like everything they do, they cant just come outright and tell their puppets that this is what they want. So they give them lofty ideals and encourage them in particular directions and hope that they deliver what was really necessary - a Satanist country outside the reach of the God and within the control of the Banksters.
And just like it happens time and again, these puppets, with their partial understanding of the real agenda, but very much starry eyed, end up delivering to their best given the circumstances, that just falls short of what the doctor ordered. Hence it took another 250 years to reach to this point, with many set backs, with central bankers ousted twice before they could establish the Fed, and with even all that achieved, still could not quite route out the ideals of liberty and the ambition of the pursuit of happiness, from that critical mass of Americans, not withstanding all the reckless migration they encouraged, that in this race to the end, the Good Guys managed to beat the Bad Guys in this final showdown.
I wonder.
The original intend was to have a House for the States = Senate, and a House for the People = Representatives.
BOTH together means Congress. And hence, Congress is the instrument through which the people exercise the Sovereignty.
The same holds for the States. Sovereign States based on a republican form of Government.
So,the People, exert through several interwoven instruments the ultimate Sovereign Power.
It the comes down to how the 10th Amendment would be understood: Does the constitution reserve a right to the States not given the the Federal Congress and thus the Federal Supreme Court to ultimately consider the matter on its constitutionality?
What if the Federal Congress usurps a right. Can that be reasserted by a State? And if so, by what method?
You hit the nail on the head. Repeal of the 17th Amendment would do more to restore the careful balance between State and Federal power created by the Founding Fathers than any piecemeal action by individual states.
Thank you.
Somebody a lot smarter than a brain-dead will need to help you out here. LOL
From the article: "The process itself seems constitutional. But if the Supreme Court decides the Federal government has sovereignty, well guess what."
So "well guess what" isn't definitive... what if the state defies the SCOTUS and says "Molon Labe"? Better yet, what if 35 or 40 states say "Molon Labe"? Would the federal government be willing to face down millions of its own citizens, when We The People have 123 firearms for every 100 people?
That "well guess what" in the article applies only in a civil society where people feel obligated to obey the law or the SCOTUS. But we're seeing a rapid decline in civil behavior and most people know that laws are only for the "little people" and not the elite.
They are not even facing down Texas.
This is the way that empires come to an end. First the outer provinces stop obeying edicts from the capitol...then they stop sending tribute... then the outer provinces begin organizing against the capitol....then the empire falls.
The Roman empire ended in just that way, and it was overrun by Barbarians. The Ottoman empire, the same. I think we're seeing the American empire beginning to crack, which just may give rise once again to a new American Republic.
If you recall the map of the states supporting Texas that was published recently, you can see the vague outlines of the future New American Republic, all the states in red. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/states-support-abbott-texas.jpg
The American Empire is dying.... Long live the American Republic!
Thanks for the history lesson. Amen.