(Perhaps) Ballot paper comes from a certain facility like banknotes, specific recipe. Or, "Watermarking" was included in the paperstock used, but as a military SAP using a different tech than standard visible watermarking. I remember hearing talk of microscopic identifiers - smart dust. This could just go into the paper process without much difficulty and kept secret, then read enmasse remotely, like super tiny RFID that causes a reaction to a probing signal and allows the quantities to be estimated - set that against the vote totals and you know for sure. You might even know for sure there were many many fakes purely on the amount of approved paper that was manufactured, being inconsistent with the total number of votes..
(Perhaps) Ballot paper comes from a certain facility like banknotes, specific recipe. Or, "Watermarking" was included in the paperstock used, but as a military SAP using a different tech than standard visible watermarking. I remember hearing talk of microscopic identifiers - smart dust. This could just go into the paper process without much difficulty and kept secret, then read enmasse remotely, like super tiny RFID that causes a reaction to a probing signal and allows the quantities to be estimated - set that against the vote totals and you know for sure. You might even know for sure there were many many fakes purely on the amount of approved paper that was manufactured, being inconsistent with the total number of votes..
"THIS" - is what ANON's come to GAW to read and enlighten them selves with ! Thank You for your input and knowledge. "Cheers" !
i think Trump talked bout smart dust but i don't remember the context-sorry