Good descriptor. While marking the paperstock somehow is certainly possible the fact that he says "QFS Blockchain encryption" and claims it uniquely identifies each ballot? and is trackable? that is non-credible as a claim. QFS is a claimed future financial system and used by loads of scammers. It is clearly disinfo. But maybe not all of it, I think genuine ballots can be determined but definitely not tracked individually, I dont see how that tech could even exist. Mentioning blockchain and encryption is alarm bells, because neither seems necessary for the central claim anyway! So it's bullshit I would say, but I still say the fraud is easily proven by other means.
Good descriptor. While marking the paperstock somehow is certainly possible the fact that he says "QFS Blockchain encryption" and claims it uniquely identifies each ballot? and is trackable? that is non-credible as a claim. QFS is a claimed future financial system and used by loads of scammers. It is clearly disinfo. But maybe not all of it, I think genuine ballots can be determined but definitely not tracked individually, I dont see how that tech could even exist. Mentioning blockchain and encryption is alarm bells, because neither seems necessary for the central claim anyway! So it's bullshit I would say, but I still say the fraud is easily proven by other means.
Valid points. Yeah, I just see this as AJ & Co. once again co-opting the GAW phenomenon. Paytriots gonna paytriot.