GEOTUS points to the Bill of Rights for a simple explanation of his planned defense against the moronic fine
(media.greatawakening.win)
- N C S W I C -
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
The really could have and should have built in some better protections.
They did. The senate was originally representing the individual states. If they had retained more power the federal insanity would be checked by the states.
But they passed the 17 amendment and made the senate stand for popular election, so no one protected the power of the states.
Checks and balances cease to work when the whole system gets corrupted. How many of our States are their owner smaller tyrannies? And cities like New York City and San Francisco?
If the states had more power they could use it against these rogue states. They have sort have done that in reverse with San Francisco. They have boycotted over 30 states and can't afford to do anything anymore. They recently gave it up.
We had a good republic, but it was stolen from us by the commie fags in DC.
I hope this helps you to begin to see how the fraud is set up and legitimized. Legal consent has been given through ignorance. This highlights the citizenry fraud
Note that the other side of this, is that the states and local de facto “authorities”all became incorporated and operate as a subsidiary of the US inc.
USC 28 (15) "United States" means— (A) a Federal corporation;
Judicial note should be taken that the United States Constitution always denoted “Citizen” and “Person” in capital letters prior to the 14th Amendment; thereafter, “citizen” and “person” were not capitalized. The distinction between “citizens of the United States” and “Union States Citizens” has been fully recognized by the Congress and the Courts as follows:
"The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress”, see U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed.829 (1873)
.“We have in our political system, a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own...” United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875).
“...he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State...” “One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States”. - McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)
.“That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state ...” - Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)
"A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government ..." - Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383Timothy
2nd amendment is just one.
John Adams said, “Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
Morality and virtue are the foundation of our republic and necessary for a society to be free.
Well they should have armored it against an immoral, secular, lazy, and stupid society.
They did. Tjhe expected people to give a shit about being free not getting free stuff.