What are the odds?
Trump post includes ‘Phase 2’
Q drop with a 6 year delta TODAY includes ‘Phase [2]’
(twitter.com)
Q-analysis!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (55)
sorted by:
Anons like us who have been around a while probably all have this view, I do, but there are a whole bunches of new ones now. It's an exciting affirmation for them. Or maybe it's nothing.... I like it though. There is (likely) no way he uses "phase" rather than "part" if not for a wink to anons.
Q2604
Hmmm.... Look, I think its fine to raise the possibility and to examine it. But it should be examined, analysed and sifted, not simply celebrated because "oooh! It looks like a comm!"
The question is, where does the train of thought lead, using the proposition as a starting point?
Does it lead to pseudo-religious beliefs that are adopted and harbored because they are emotionally satisfying (aka 'opiate hopium') or does it lead to increased understanding, greater apprehension of truth, and an even more robust mental approach in which critical thinking plays an important part (aka what I would call 'hopermectin')?
I'm not saying you can't like it. I'm saying that choosing to believe in certain things comes with consequences, and all anons should be mindful of where their thinking is leading them. To me, that seems axiomatic to everything that Q posted.
With apologies, this seems highly subjective as a speculation.
If you can make the argument and back it with evidence and reasoning (for example, use of phase vs part in a body of linguistic corpus (aka a large volume of text or speech that shows how and where phase is used, in what contexts, vs part, in what contexts, etc), (how much DJT uses it, etc, etc.), then I could take the assertion seriously, but on itself, I think it's just a speculative idea adopted as a belief.
Just saying! Devil's avocado, and all that...
Well played fren. Yes, I understand exactly what you are saying and I don't disagree.
As far as phase vs part; I have never heard somebody say phase 2 rather than part 2. I get it though, to be accurate and substantiate the claim, a bit of research would need to be done to make a conclusion.
Appreciate ya fren. Always keepin it in cheq.
Thanks for the response. Appreciated!!!
Yeah, so this is where one has to balance and measure subjective views vs. evidence and facts. This is the challenge, because the blind spots are where we cannot see them. In other words, we don't know what we don't know.
In some situations, when there is a lack of data and input, it's natural to go with one's subjective conclusions based wholly on one's experience, but it's too easy to bend towards one biases in such situations.
Either way, I think the post has been good in as much as it created an opportunity for discussion on these points.
Be well fren!
You too fren. I do appreciate your objective take on situations. As you said, it’s easy to fall into the subjective side when there are unknowns. It is a difficult task to stick to facts and not fill in blanks with emotions or notions. Kek o7