I am no supporter of Nimrata Haley, it occurs to me she generally seemed to stick with America First at the UN when working for Trump (though my memory could be way off on that).
What if some of these primary candidates were fully on board with Trump & them "running" against him is just a method of draining the opposition funds on a candidate to nowhere?
At this point I wouldn't be suprised if this theory is accurate, & it could make for a fantastic script/movie. Though just wanted to see what other interesting ideas you guys all have that could play along with the plan, regardless of them being accurate or not. It gets the ol' noggin joggin with a game theory exercise.
The reality is, most people start off with ideals and want to change the world. Only when they are tested under intense pressure - with money, with threats, with blackmail etc, will their real nature come out.
During Trump's first term, there was no way to know whether Nimrata or any other such people were true patriots. But one of the purpose of this devolution was to separate out the wheat from the chafe.
Ones who stick around till the very end against Trump are the ones who were most compromised.
IF there was a printed sentence that made more sense than anything that I have seen is this sentence..."Only when they are tested under intense pressure - with money, with threats, with blackmail etc, will their real nature come out."
One of THE most profound sentences to come out of all of the nonsense...
Outstanding!!!!
Yup^^^
Yup^^^