My beef with Scott on this is he acts like the facts or information have changed, but other than an abundance of happy non-customers and some statistics from the government that are likely fraudulent and don't match our day to day experiences, we haven't gotten any new info.
--
The risk of harm from COVID was known to be very low.
The presence of ridiculous and ineffective guidance from the government was known. (i.e. we had a year of incompetent action and advice from government, media, and medical professionals)
The experimental status of multiple mechanisms of the vaccine products was known.
The availability and efficacy of safe, repurposed drugs was known.
The fact that the spike protein itself was problematic was widely known.
Based on the fact that the spike protein was known to be harmful, it called into question the whole method of effect of the vaccine.
The fact that boosters would be needed was widely inferred by the laity (I'll grant Scott that this info never made it to the educated classes because it had to be manifested through independent thought).
--
Any one of those factors would make me a NO for the vaccine. When 100% of those factors are present it goes to a HELL NO.
Scott carries on like we just play the "distrust" card 100% of the time and got lucky and that's bullshit.
My beef with Scott on this is he acts like the facts or information have changed, but other than an abundance of happy non-customers and some statistics from the government that are likely fraudulent and don't match our day to day experiences, we haven't gotten any new info.
--
The risk of harm from COVID was known to be very low.
The presence of ridiculous and ineffective guidance from the government was known. (i.e. we had a year of incompetent action and advice from government, media, and medical professionals)
The experimental status of multiple mechanisms of the vaccine products was known.
The availability and efficacy of safe, repurposed drugs was known.
The fact that the spike protein itself was problematic was widely known.
Based on the fact that the spike protein was known to be harmful, it called into question the whole method of effect of the vaccine.
The fact that boosters would be needed was widely inferred by the laity (I'll grant Scott that this info never made it to the educated classes because it had to be manifested through independent thought).
--
Any one of those factors would make me a NO for the vaccine. When 100% of those factors are present it goes to a HELL NO.
Scott carries on like we just play the "distrust" card 100% of the time and got lucky and that's bullshit.