Is this to cover up the theorized involvement of his wife? Her visit just before he died and her speech at the Munich Security Conference are two coincidents I am having trouble digesting. Trying to focus anons on the jab really seems limited hangout type shit to me. Playing on our biases. This doesnt really move the needle for me. Im not willing to believe a Ukraine spy chief who may have been deeply involved in the removal of an asset under enemy control.
Is this to cover up the theorized involvement of his wife? Her visit just before he died and her speech at the Munich Security Conference are two coincidents I am having trouble digesting. Trying to focus anons on the jab really seems limited hangout type shit to me. Playing on our biases. This doesnt really move the needle for me. Im not willing to believe a Ukraine spy chief who may have been deeply involved in the removal of an asset under enemy control.