Like most of you here, I keep playing different scenarios out in my head as to what's going on... will there be WWIII? Will there be a market collapse? Will there be riots? Will the 2024 election be stolen again (maybe the extra 'l'... stollen... means that it will happen twice, or again?)
But there's something that sticks out in my mind. At some point a few months ago there was something on this board that I cannot find that was explaining how Trump stated behind the scenes that it was his decision not to push the truth about the stolen 2020 election because he feared it would cause civil war. (Courtesy of Luminosity, below... thanks! https://greatawakening.win/p/17s5avqkW9/president-trump-hints-that-he-wa/c/)
Was that ever proven, that he said that? Or was that debunked? Anyway, my thoughts are based on him saying that.
Before I get to my scenario considerations, I want to address the momentum of the Great Awakening. Currently, not enough people are awake in my opinion. In fact, the more that "conspiracy theories" abound, the more the left digs their heels in, and many sheep dig in with them. Some might say, "Well, the Precipice hasn't occurred yet, so people will wake up when that happens." Although I agree that the Precipice has not yet been reached, I think that the slow drip approach--although effective in many ways--has resulted in a hardening of the cognitive dissonance among so many (my opinion and theory).
So, the Precipice will arrive and although everyone will hurt, too many people will still not attach their hurt/suffering to the cabal, or communism, or evil, or lefty wokeness, etc. Without declassification and sharing of the evidence of child trafficking and sacrifice, and the people involved, I don't think we'll be able to overcome the cognitive dissonance that just seems to always be ahead. And the number who will never 'get it' is greater than 6%. My opinion is that it is north of 15%. This presents many challenges, but that's a topic for a different post.
You may not agree with what I've shared thus far, but the following scenarios are based on it.
Scenario 1: Trump is re-elected in a landslide victory in a "normal" election. I put "normal" in quotes because "normal" means some sort of fraud occurred, as it has in the past--but Trump still wins. In this scenario, because there are still so many who are not awake (based on my opinion and explanation above), we will be so far from unity. It will still be ugly. I don't think Trump wants this. I believe that in his heart, he wants a unified, powerful Republic.
Scenario 2: Trump loses again via a fixed election, despite even the MSM polls showing that Trump is supposed to win. This wakes up more people, but it's too late... those who stomached the first fraudulent loss will finally snap. The risk of people taking things into their own hands, and possibly outright civil war, will be even greater than when Trump was fearing it the first time around. So Trump does not want this scenario, either.
So, whether he wins or loses, I don't believe we achieve the unity we all hope for and that I think Trump desires, too. Both of the above scenarios also include the Precipice in my opinion, too.
You can come up with many different variations of the "normal" win/lose, but I cannot think of any where 94% are awake and unified--except we might get very close with the declassification of the ugly stuff.
I am left with a different scenario, then.
Scenario 3: The Precipice is reached via a collection of big, ugly things that cause suffering. Then it is finally revealed that 2020 can be officially proven as being fraudulent stolen, so that everyone attributes the Precipice to these traitor thieves. Trump is instated as President. An election is held in 2024 on schedule but is orchestrated and overseen by the military and National Guard, with all of the rules and authenticity that we desire. Trump wins, beyond our imagination. We avert civil war and civil conflict. The Republic is finally restored. There are some rocky moments with stalwart enemies, but they are neutralized quickly. We Make America Great Again.
That is my hope as to how things play out. It's kind of a date fag moment, because it obviously is tied to the election. If this is sort of like the high level plan that is unfolding, things should be getting spicy in terms of everyday living very soon, because there's not much time.
Why did I post this? Well, first, just for my own sanity. Second, I'm curious to know what others think. Thanks for reading.
One thing that has been top of mind for me, that I can't stop thinking about, and runs parallel to what you post is this:
There are not as many liberals out there that the left would have you believe. A few points to that effect:
Immigration. They are brining in a lot of "new" voters. This was always their plan. If they actually had the liberal base they claim, this would not be necessary.
Twit/X. Since Elon bought it, the amount of bots has gone way down, the liberal echo chamber has gone way down, and it is actually far more conservative than liberal (IMO, I am not on it enough to confirm this, I am just going by comments I see)
The Census. There has been fuckery abound forever around the census: counting illegals, counting fake people, this has been happening to decades. This would not need to be done if there are actual liberals.
The "blue cities in a sea of red" effect. They would have us believe that liberals in 99% of the country just congregate in large cities? On its surface, this makes sense because country folk tend to be conservative, but suburbs are (mostly) pretty red, most counties outside of metro areas are deep red, is it true that cities are actually red or is that just the myth that's perpetuated? Look at PA. Outside of Pitt and Philly, it is deep red. Look at Texas, hell look at Cali. I don't believe for a second that cities are just by nature super liberal. And if you look at where the most fraud occurred, it is in cities. And I would bet my favorite pair of Crocs that cheating has been going on in these places for a long time.
My own personal anecdote. I live in a red county, work in a blue city, in a deep blue state. If you look at my circle of people I know, maybe 10% are liberal. Maybe 10% more lean lib but aren't hardcore left. Even people I talk to are probably 80% conservative, I would even say closer to 90.
Just a thought
Disagree with point 4. Cities are naturally more blue because people can be freaks in cities. Cities also have night life which enables freaks. Being a furry in Seattle is much easier than being a furry in Eastern WA.
So what is your explanation for everyone left of center to congregate in cities?