Someone's still going to have to comb through these every single time.
I'm really against the need for AI to read long bills. If they're that long they shouldn't be voted on at all. If the average person can't read them in full in an hour or so it shouldn't be even brought up for debate.
I could see this opening the door to massive bills that AI reads and summarizes into a few hours of reading.. but it skips key pieces (either programmed after elon dies, programmed without his knowledge to skip), and everyone votes on the bill that has a clause 'everyone will willfully be enslaved when this is passed'
I'm just going to say: Don't blindly trust it
Someone's still going to have to comb through these every single time.
I'm really against the need for AI to read long bills. If they're that long they shouldn't be voted on at all. If the average person can't read them in full in an hour or so it shouldn't be even brought up for debate.
I could see this opening the door to massive bills that AI reads and summarizes into a few hours of reading.. but it skips key pieces (either programmed after elon dies, programmed without his knowledge to skip), and everyone votes on the bill that has a clause 'everyone will willfully be enslaved when this is passed'
These bills should be limited to 1500 words. The length of an upper level essay amd no legalese should be allowed.
1 issue, 1 bill