Yup. We have “code of conduct” training every year, and this is one of the point they make. The reason i bring it up now is because supposedly the judge hearing this case seems to be leaning into the “cant prove it beyond his own presumably reasonable doubt”
Low level peons cant even have any “appearance” of impropriety, yet for these people can?
Yup. We have “code of conduct” training every year, and this is one of the point they make. The reason i bring it up now is because supposedly the judge hearing this case seems to be leaning into the “cant prove it beyond his own presumably reasonable doubt”
Low level peons cant even have any “appearance” of impropriety, yet for these people can?
Then that judge is corrupt becuss it's plainly obvious what was proven