If they can ignite a moving aircraft I believe the capability exists to ignite a house. Although they won't disclose all their capabilities to the public. Maybe they can, maybe they can't. But the possibility exists.
Maybe they can, maybe they can't. But the possibility exists.
This is exactly why it belongs on conspiracy.win. Not because it is guaranteed to be false, but because it is a long way from being feasible. The place to further vet it is there.
Isn't that the whole premise behind Q? Most of the claims are unproven. Every now and then a delta comes through. But mostly unsubstantiated. Also, questioning the causes of crazy fires is part of the awakening. Can't just accept the CNN version.
The point was to start thinking critically, so you don't keep getting the wool pulled over your eyes. They didn't say, "all your craziest theories are correct. all of it."
We know they commit mass arson. They use it to steal land, to "prove" climate change, target food supplies, etc. And we have proof they are using antifa idiots to do it. We've caught them walking out the woods with 5 gallon gas cans and they dismiss it saying, "oh, they were filled with water because these patriots were FIGHTING the fires."
Then they get us to stop serving up proof of their efforts by injecting space lasers into the conversation. Now we have a bunch of useless infighting because anons have gas lit themselves on clever info-war crap thinking its more important to paint their house UN blue, hide under umbrellas, and argue with fellow patriots than to keep digging and showing the ACTUAL arson going on that we can ACTUALLY prove.
I think DEWs get called space lasers in order to make people sound dumb. Directed energy does exist. The best way to dismiss it is to call it a space laser.
Remember the first time you heard someone question the official 9/11 narrative how bat shit crazy they sounded? Now when you meet someone that still believes it was Bin Laden and building 7 fell thanks to a fire, they're the ones that are retarded.
So by discussion and through investigation we arrive at the truth and by dismissing directed energy (from planet earth) and calling it space lasers, pew pew pew, we are able to delay the truth coming out and just dismiss all the anomalies of the fire as people with gas cans doing selected burns. Or worse yet, climate change.
If they can ignite a moving aircraft I believe the capability exists to ignite a house. Although they won't disclose all their capabilities to the public. Maybe they can, maybe they can't. But the possibility exists.
Its not the target, its the distance.
This is exactly why it belongs on conspiracy.win. Not because it is guaranteed to be false, but because it is a long way from being feasible. The place to further vet it is there.
Isn't that the whole premise behind Q? Most of the claims are unproven. Every now and then a delta comes through. But mostly unsubstantiated. Also, questioning the causes of crazy fires is part of the awakening. Can't just accept the CNN version.
The point was to start thinking critically, so you don't keep getting the wool pulled over your eyes. They didn't say, "all your craziest theories are correct. all of it."
We know they commit mass arson. They use it to steal land, to "prove" climate change, target food supplies, etc. And we have proof they are using antifa idiots to do it. We've caught them walking out the woods with 5 gallon gas cans and they dismiss it saying, "oh, they were filled with water because these patriots were FIGHTING the fires."
Then they get us to stop serving up proof of their efforts by injecting space lasers into the conversation. Now we have a bunch of useless infighting because anons have gas lit themselves on clever info-war crap thinking its more important to paint their house UN blue, hide under umbrellas, and argue with fellow patriots than to keep digging and showing the ACTUAL arson going on that we can ACTUALLY prove.
I think DEWs get called space lasers in order to make people sound dumb. Directed energy does exist. The best way to dismiss it is to call it a space laser.
Exactly.
Remember the first time you heard someone question the official 9/11 narrative how bat shit crazy they sounded? Now when you meet someone that still believes it was Bin Laden and building 7 fell thanks to a fire, they're the ones that are retarded.
So by discussion and through investigation we arrive at the truth and by dismissing directed energy (from planet earth) and calling it space lasers, pew pew pew, we are able to delay the truth coming out and just dismiss all the anomalies of the fire as people with gas cans doing selected burns. Or worse yet, climate change.
That's not good enough for GAW, frog. For instance, read this