You just seem to show up everywhere. Space travel is dangerous, period. I was alive through both shuttle disasters (the first of which you seem to have forgotton?). And while painful, life goes on. How many men did Columbus lose in 1492? Explorers sign up for the dangerous jobs. I'm connecting dots - look into the Q post and give it some thought - just maybe you'll "get it" too
I haven't forgotten the Challenger disaster. I still have a copy of "Prescription for Disaster" by Trento on my bookshelf. You weren't reading closely. It was the Columbia disaster that prompted the retirement of the Space Shuttle program, because NASA finally awakened to an inherent and fatal design flaw.
Air travel in general is maybe not dangerous, in your view? We shouldn't be upset at 346 passengers and crew killed by 737 MAX crashes because of malicious software? Just suck up the dangerous jobs?
I've actually worked in this business. What insight are you suggesting that I "get"? I would like to know.
If a car has automatic steering that fights the driver for control and crashes into bridge abutments at full speed, why not? Those 346 deaths were entirely preventable by responsible design decisions. There was no study performed by Boeing that uncovered the inherent fatal behavior. How do I know? I was on the program progress review board where these decisions were made, and the MCAS was waved away as a trivial software edit. So, I put you with the complacent ones.
The design requirement on airliners is that the statistical probability of a fatal event on any given flight should be no greater than on in ten million. The 737 MAX was a flunk.
I am definitely not complacent. I will not get on an airplane right now, or since the pandemic started, or until the storm is over. Vaxxed pilots dropping dead or otherwise having their heads stuck up their own or someone else's ass is enough for me.
Boeing is deep state, in case you hadn't pieced that together. At the end of the day, you have a choice to get on a plane or drive on the freeway or take a shot. If someone is going to try to force me to do any of those things against my will, well, they're going to find out.
The shuttle program was retired because it could be used against the deep state by white hats should it have been operational during Trump's term. You are just parroting the cover story.
So your arguments and accusations don't make any sense. And based on how you've been ratioed in this conversation, I think most here agree w me.
You just seem to show up everywhere. Space travel is dangerous, period. I was alive through both shuttle disasters (the first of which you seem to have forgotton?). And while painful, life goes on. How many men did Columbus lose in 1492? Explorers sign up for the dangerous jobs. I'm connecting dots - look into the Q post and give it some thought - just maybe you'll "get it" too
I haven't forgotten the Challenger disaster. I still have a copy of "Prescription for Disaster" by Trento on my bookshelf. You weren't reading closely. It was the Columbia disaster that prompted the retirement of the Space Shuttle program, because NASA finally awakened to an inherent and fatal design flaw.
Air travel in general is maybe not dangerous, in your view? We shouldn't be upset at 346 passengers and crew killed by 737 MAX crashes because of malicious software? Just suck up the dangerous jobs?
I've actually worked in this business. What insight are you suggesting that I "get"? I would like to know.
Are you saying we should decommission and retire all airplanes because it's not 100% safe ? Now do cars.
If a car has automatic steering that fights the driver for control and crashes into bridge abutments at full speed, why not? Those 346 deaths were entirely preventable by responsible design decisions. There was no study performed by Boeing that uncovered the inherent fatal behavior. How do I know? I was on the program progress review board where these decisions were made, and the MCAS was waved away as a trivial software edit. So, I put you with the complacent ones.
The design requirement on airliners is that the statistical probability of a fatal event on any given flight should be no greater than on in ten million. The 737 MAX was a flunk.
I am definitely not complacent. I will not get on an airplane right now, or since the pandemic started, or until the storm is over. Vaxxed pilots dropping dead or otherwise having their heads stuck up their own or someone else's ass is enough for me.
Boeing is deep state, in case you hadn't pieced that together. At the end of the day, you have a choice to get on a plane or drive on the freeway or take a shot. If someone is going to try to force me to do any of those things against my will, well, they're going to find out.
The shuttle program was retired because it could be used against the deep state by white hats should it have been operational during Trump's term. You are just parroting the cover story.
So your arguments and accusations don't make any sense. And based on how you've been ratioed in this conversation, I think most here agree w me.