I'll admit this: My first port of call with Johnson was to dig on his web presence, how he promotes himself, his websites and few opinions by random people on the wbe about him.

At this juncture, the issue I have with him is not the documentation, but his passing off as his own amazing work that I'm inclined to believe isn't. (I'm influenced by his manner and behavior, I admit.) I don't really have any inclination to investigate what he presents because of that. So I guess that's a form of bias.

But also, I very much appreciate the work of Patel Patriot and the people at Badlands, which I think is frankly an amazing operation, and it's clear he is pretty unimpressed and blames Johnson for taking all his work and then passing it off as his own, so I guess that's a second bias on my part.

But I tend to gravitate and listen to people who pull me in with their attitude, personality and approach. In other words, I do feel guided by the Spirit to tune in to some as opposed to others. There is sooooo much information and so many 'informationers' out there that even if one were to spend 24 hours a day, you'd only scratch the surface. So it's really important how you pick who to listen and pay attention to, imo.

I don't feel any inclination to tune in to Johnson, partly for the aforementioned reasons, and I'm OK with that choice. I mean, who knows? Maybe he's just a narcisistic dude with good intentions. I don't think so, personally, but I mean, maybe....

So, in conclusion, I'm not disputing the essential premises of devolution by any means (even though I disagree with quite a few aspects of Johnson's own assertions), but I have serious doubts that Johnson himself is legitimate, in that what he presents is all his hard work.

BTW, for what its worth, your point about the "Biden is fake" "Biden is an actor" narratives is well made and I agree 150%. Those narratives have so many holes, it make swiss cheese look like a concrete block.