To me, no 'ism is the perfect solution. They all have issues and, interestingly, although they seem to set off in opposite directions they still meet up round the back!
For instance, Capitalism has given us the bankers. They have their own states within states, a skewed system that allows them to make $trillions and they want to control everything themselves. Capitalism has also given us Corporatism and the government working in "Public-Private Partnerships" which seems to be another way of describing Fascism.
Implementations of Marxism want to get people on the same level but, in practice, that means lowering everyone's standard of living except for the leaders who control everything.
Either way, there is a pull towards a Feudal system with the exalted at the top who own and control everything and the peasants at the bottom doing as they are told, or else.
To me, no 'ism is the perfect solution. They all have issues and, interestingly, although they seem to set off in opposite directions they still meet up round the back!
For instance, Capitalism has given us the bankers. They have their own states within states, a skewed system that allows them to make $trillions and they want to control everything themselves. Capitalism has also given us Corporatism and the government working in "Public-Private Partnerships" which seems to be another way of describing Fascism.
Implementations of Marxism want to get people on the same level but, in practice, that means lowering everyone's standard of living except for the leaders who control everything.
Either way, there is a pull towards a Feudal system with the exalted at the top who own and control everything and the peasants at the bottom doing as they are told, or else.