The United States, Great Britain, and most of Europe are all being conquered from within.
It's being done by flooding them with hostile foreigners who care nothing about the culture there and actually would destroy it if they could (and are, because its western values are diametrically opposed to their eastern values.)
The native citizens of those lands are being severely punished for resisting this invasion in any way. Anything that would promote patriotism, a sense of unity, or a national identity is crushed and twisted and turned into something negative as much as possible.
In Britain, the Royal Family is a longstanding, rock-solid cultural symbol. Getting rid of the RF would go a long way towards the further dismantling of traditional British culture. And what better time to make a move against them than now, since the beloved Queen Elizabeth is dead?
Note: They NEVER back out of public appearances. What's happening now is unprecedented. The monarch has a great deal of influence over the government there. They are not just figureheads.
King Charles has cancer and is no longer seen publicly.
His wife, Queen Camilla, started to pick up the slack but just announced that she, too, will be stepping back from public appearances.
Catherine, the much-loved Princess of Wales, was last seen on Christmas Day and is said to be suffering from an unnamed serious illness that will keep her out until at least Easter. There are no other reports about her in the news, even though the public is clamoring for them.
Prince William, Catherine's husband and next in line to the throne, is trying to appear when he can but has lately been pulling out of appearances at the last minute.
A second cousin of Williams, 45-year-old Thomas Kingston, was found shot to death on his parents' property just last week - just a few hours after having lunch with his parents. He was a good man by all accounts and showed no signs of being suicidal, which is what the news is saying he did.
So: If you don't care about the royal family, that's fine. But you might want to be aware that they are a very large piece of western culture that appears to be very close to falling, and if they do it's going to make a bigger crash than you think. It bears watching, especially when you look at all the other cultural icons under attack in the western world.
No No No. British royalty is corrupt and basically illegitimate due to the numerous assassinations of heirs over hundreds of years to get to the present line.
They have nothing to offer other than pomp, and that is ridiculously over the top in the present day and age.
NO NO NO! We got rid of British Royalty aka German George III for a reason and many reasons.
The treaties of WW I eliminated e.g. German aristocracy (cousins of the Brit crown via Queen Victoria) but kept the Brit crown? WHY?
It is obsolete, grossly expensive, serves no legitimate purpose. BE GONE!
Just to be clear, the German aristos are still around, they have just changed outfits. As an historical example, there are those Royals who were displaced by the Germans/Dutch, just because one guy fell in love with a Catholic woman, or something (James II). He fled for his life to the continent, never to return. What followed, was the old pretender plotting, and the Bonnie Prince akshully leading an army, from the North, who tried to take it all back. Much death. I think that is the point you were driving at, with the vanishing current Royals - it can lead to an ugly power vacuum.
To be fair, at least the Stuart Kings were Scottish, descended from the Tudors, in part (They had Polish, French and Spanish going on). What the reformists installed on the throne instead (and they were unable to abolish the position, as the people demanded a King), was a second cousin lady (Mary Stuart) married to a stronk Dutch General (William of Orange) and there were the increasingly German (and Danish) descendants. In terms of trust, that was cheating, because the Stuart King had arbitrarily been removed with threats upon his life, just because his wife was a Catholic, (and part of that faith is to marry only Catholics). So, given that the 'new' thing was to persecute those who did not tow the anti-papist Protestant lines, introduced by Henry VIII, it seemed that a Royal could be deprived of the throne for Religious reasons: there was a betrayal of trust, and a feeling that the throne was not all it was cracked up to be. In fact, some clandestine assassins were able to install others.
OF course, another explanation for the German infiltration, is that there were proportionately, so many German aristorats available on the marriage market, being as each had a tiny scrap of fiefdom, but were rich and attractive aristos nevertheless. So they populated all the royal courts, as they have done for centuries.
And I guess there is the violence aspect: the Royal Family have the Butcher of Cumberland to thank for quelling the peoples march for what the soldiers viewed was the rightful king, in 1745 (not those continental twats). My point being that the Royals defended the throne by killing everyone who supported the Prince, and then there are the debts owed with each revolution etc. ...
Yes they chose their royal line to eliminate Catholics in favor of Protestants despite actual claim to the throne. Eliz did wrong by her cousin Mary etc.