What people in my area have found is that not one county supervisor has a valid oath of office (they leave out parts). If I'm not mistaken, the same is true for Biden's cabinet. This can't be a coincidence. They're fakes. You may wonder if people can have this kind of audacity. Remember this is a crown corporation. Ever heard of palace intrigue? It's alive and well.
(6)“person” means any employee, or agent of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof, and any individual, partnership, association, joint stock company, trust, or corporation;
the Law Dictionary.org
A man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the rights to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes. 1 Bouv. Inst. no. 137. A human being considered as capable of having rights and of being charged with duties; while a “thing” is the object over which rights may be exercised.
which the interwebs says was only recently changed? how long ago?
termly.io defines "natrual person" as "1.
A natural person (also sometimes referred to as a physical person) is a title used to identify an individual human being. This is different from a legal person, which can be an individual or a company."
why the change? thanks for the rabbit hole, as though I needed another...
still maintaining the sovereign citizen opinion for the moment.
I think "sovereign citizen" is a manufactured term, just like "conspiracy theorist", meant to smear people seeking freedom. You can't be a citizen and sovereign. It's like being a Christian Atheist.
If the Supreme Court distinguishes that a second and separates class of citizenry was created by the 14th amendment, then what does this mean?
Do you know?
Are you a federal employee of the United States Inc. known as a US citizen?
USC 28 (15) "United States" means— (A) a Federal corporation;
Judicial note should be taken that the United States Constitution always denoted “Citizen” and “Person” in capital letters prior to the 14th Amendment; thereafter, “citizen” and “person” were not capitalized. The distinction between “citizens of the United States” and “Union States Citizens” has been fully recognized by the Congress and the Courts as follows:
"The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress”, see U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed.829 (1873)
“We have in our political system, a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own...” United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875).
“...he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State...” “One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States”. - McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)
.“That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state ...” - Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)
"A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government ..." - Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383Timothy
sounds too much like sovereign citizen stuff to me.
Agreed. Would like more clarification.
Look at my response above. I've seen this work in Texas. This lady is 100% correct.
What people in my area have found is that not one county supervisor has a valid oath of office (they leave out parts). If I'm not mistaken, the same is true for Biden's cabinet. This can't be a coincidence. They're fakes. You may wonder if people can have this kind of audacity. Remember this is a crown corporation. Ever heard of palace intrigue? It's alive and well.
Have you ever dug in to the legal definition of "person"?
18 US Code 2510
the Law Dictionary.org
which the interwebs says was only recently changed? how long ago?
termly.io defines "natrual person" as "1. A natural person (also sometimes referred to as a physical person) is a title used to identify an individual human being. This is different from a legal person, which can be an individual or a company."
why the change? thanks for the rabbit hole, as though I needed another...
still maintaining the sovereign citizen opinion for the moment.
I think "sovereign citizen" is a manufactured term, just like "conspiracy theorist", meant to smear people seeking freedom. You can't be a citizen and sovereign. It's like being a Christian Atheist.
On a side note, sovereign citizen is an oxymoron.
It is in my opinion a fed psyop and Hollywood script they use in tv to manipulate people into the reaction your having now.
If the Supreme Court distinguishes that a second and separates class of citizenry was created by the 14th amendment, then what does this mean?
Do you know?
Are you a federal employee of the United States Inc. known as a US citizen?
USC 28 (15) "United States" means— (A) a Federal corporation;
Judicial note should be taken that the United States Constitution always denoted “Citizen” and “Person” in capital letters prior to the 14th Amendment; thereafter, “citizen” and “person” were not capitalized. The distinction between “citizens of the United States” and “Union States Citizens” has been fully recognized by the Congress and the Courts as follows:
"The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress”, see U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed.829 (1873)
“We have in our political system, a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own...” United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875).
“...he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State...” “One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States”. - McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)
.“That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state ...” - Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)
"A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government ..." - Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383Timothy